胎儿胎体的民法规范及立法选择

发布时间：2018-01-14 07:05

本文关键词：胎儿胎体的民法规范及立法选择　出处：《云南社会科学》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：受限于医学的认识和立法简洁等因素的考量,传统理论认为胎儿并不具有独立的民事主体地位,对胎儿胎体的伤害只能视为对孕妇母体的伤害。中国民法应该对胎儿胎体保护路径与价值判断结论都作出回应。应将胎儿胎体与身体权的建构相应结合,并承认活着出生的人对其胎儿期间的胎体享有身体权。胎儿在胎体受到侵害后未活着出生,在满足一定法律条件下,母亲应可以自己的名义向责任人主张伤残和精神损害等赔偿。胎儿胎体的民法规范在解释选择上应坚守主体始于出生说。
[Abstract]:Understanding and legislation is limited to medical simple considerations, the traditional theory holds that the fetus does not have independent civil subject status of fetal carcass damage can only be regarded as the maternal damage. Chinese civil law should have responded to the fetal carcass protection path and value judgment. The construction of the matrix and fetal body right the corresponding combination, and recognize the born alive on the fetus during the carcass enjoy body right. The fetus infringed on carcass after being born alive, under certain legal conditions, the mother should be in their own name to the responsible person and the spiritual damage compensation for disability claims. The civil law should stick to the main body of fetus that begins at birth in the choice of interpretation.

【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院;河北经贸大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“民法证据规范论:案件事实的形成与民法学方法论的完善”(项目号:15FFX005)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 有关胎儿的法律规定最早可以溯及到古罗马时代。在古罗马法中,就有“胎儿其利益为问题时,视为既已出生”的法律格言。(1)受限于医疗移植水平,传统民法对胎儿的调整局限于继承制度,基本不涉及其他方面。民法上对胎儿胎体的规范和保护问题的讨论是近百年才开始的。胎体即胎儿的

【相似文献】