自助游事故民事责任的法律分析

发布时间：2018-01-15 12:33

本文关键词：自助游事故民事责任的法律分析　出处：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着生活水平的逐步提高,人们对旅游的需求不再满足于旅行团式的走马观花,也不再仅仅止步于人文景观,户外自助式探索大自然的旅游方式开始风靡。然而,想要征服大自然的自助户外爱好者却频频遭遇意外,痛失亲人的家属一纸诉状向法院寻求救济的同时也暴露了这类旅游方式在法律规范上的空白。本文首先对两例相似案例不同的判决进行分析,总结焦点问题,然后采用文献研究法、演绎推理等研究方法,对自助游的相关基础理论与案例的焦点问题相结合进行分析,并得出结论,最后对实践中如何规范自助游和更好的防范、控制自助游的风险提出法律建议。本文将从以下四个部分进行论述:第一部分:结合案例分析,归纳总结自助游事故民事责任所呈现的焦点问题,分别是发起人的安全保障义务、自冒风险规则和公平分担损失规则。第二部分:对自助游中是否存在法律关系进行观点的论述分析,对法律行为说进行批判的同时肯定了自助游活动属于情谊行为。第三部分:对焦点问题进行法律分析,肯定发起人应负有合理限度内的安全保障义务,自冒风险规则应适用于自助游中,并适当限制适用公平分担损失规则。第四部分:结合前文对自助游事故民事责任分析结论的基础上提出相关建议,包括立法方面要明确发起人的安全保障义务、自冒风险和公平分担损失规则的适用,并建立健全风险预警机制、商人准入机制以及救助机制。
[Abstract]:With the gradual improvement of living standards, people's demand for tourism is no longer satisfied with the tour group style, also no longer just stop at the humanistic landscape. Outdoor self-service exploration of nature has become popular. However, self-help outdoor enthusiasts who want to conquer nature are often surprised. The bereaved family members of the court to seek relief at the same time also exposed this kind of tourism in the legal norms of the blank. This paper first of two similar cases of different judgments to summarize the focus of the issue. Then using the literature research method, deductive reasoning and other research methods, the relevant basic theory of self-help tour and the focus of the case are analyzed, and the conclusion is drawn. Finally, the author puts forward legal advice on how to regulate self-help tour and better prevention, and control the risk of self-help tour in practice. This article will discuss from the following four parts: the first part: combined with the case analysis. Summing up the focus of the civil liability of self-help tourism accidents, respectively, are the safety and security obligations of sponsors. Self-risk rules and fair allocation of loss rules. Part two: the discussion and analysis of whether there is a legal relationship in self-help tours. While criticizing the theory of legal acts, it affirms that self-help activities belong to friendship behavior. The third part: the focus of the legal analysis, it is affirmed that the sponsors should have reasonable limits of safety and security obligations. Self-risk rules should be applied to self-help tours, and appropriate restrictions on the application of fair allocation of loss rules. Part 4th: combined with the previous analysis of the civil liability of self-help accidents based on the relevant recommendations. Including legislation to clarify the safety and security obligations of sponsors, the application of the rules of risk taking and fair sharing of losses, and the establishment of a sound risk warning mechanism, businessmen access mechanism and rescue mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】