对专利授权确权审查程序中权利要求的理解

发布时间：2018-01-26 23:15

本文关键词： 专利确权权利要求理解解释最宽合理　出处：《知识产权》2016年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：专利授权确权程序中的权利要求理解重在对权利要求要求保护的技术内容的理解和确定,而非对专利实际保护范围的确定,不应当适用《专利法》第59条。授权和确权程序中,权利要求术语应当理解为其在本领域的通常含义,除非说明书对其进行足够清楚的特别定义的除外。这种通常含义的理解不能脱离权利要求所限定的主题做宽泛的理解,也不能脱离权利要求中的技术特征,将说明书的内容引入权利要求书中。确权程序仍然是对权利要求的技术内容是否符合授权条件进行的审查,因此也应当适用通常含义理解的原则,其程序中的修改方式和原则较授权阶段有更严格的限制是各国通常的做法,不足以得出确权程序适用其他权利要求理解方法的结论。权利要求的理解必须建立在权利要求清楚的前提之下进行,权利要求的理解是对权利要求术语所涵盖的技术内容范围的认定,而非对技术内容本身不清楚的澄清。后者的情况应当适用《专利法》第26条第4款权利要求不清楚的审查规则来解决。
[Abstract]:The understanding of the claim in the patent authorization confirmation procedure focuses on the understanding and determination of the technical content of the claim protection, rather than the determination of the actual scope of the patent protection. Article 59 of the Patent Law. Authorization and confirmation procedures should not be applied, and the term claims shall be understood as its usual meaning in this field. Unless the specification provides a sufficiently clear and specific definition of it... this understanding of the ordinary meaning cannot be understood broadly in relation to the subject matter defined by the claim or in relation to the technical characteristics of the claim. Introducing the content of the specification into the claim. The confirmation procedure remains a review of whether the technical content of the claim meets the conditions of authorization and should therefore also be governed by the principle of understanding the usual meaning. It is the usual practice of States to modify the modalities and principles in their procedures with more stringent limitations than at the authorization stage. It is not sufficient to conclude that the confirmation procedure applies other methods of interpretation of claims... the interpretation of claims must be based on a clear claim. The claim is understood as the determination of the scope of the technical content covered by the claim term. Rather than clarifying the technical content itself, the latter case should be dealt with by the review rules of Article 26, paragraph 4, of the Patent Law, which are unclear.
【作者单位】：国家知识产权局专利复审委员会研究处;
【分类号】：D923.42
【正文快照】： 专利授权确权程序中对权利要求的理解问题,近来成为业界的热点。虽然美国最高法院针对CUOZZO案件的判决回应了几个重要的问题,但这些问题在我国的无效宣告案件审查中同样具有争议,为此,本文拟与业内人士讨论以下几个问题:第一,授权确权程序的权利要求理解所适用的原则与侵权司

【相似文献】