私权自治中的政策介入研究

发布时间：2018-02-04 17:35

本文关键词： 公权力私权力政策介入私权自治　出处：《天津商业大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“私权神圣”是私权自治得以实现的重要法律精神,政策无权对私权自治进行强制介入。然而基于法律的被动局限性、执法者的个人素养差异等等因素,使得政策介入私权自治的合理性大大提高。第一章以“法治社会”为制高点,以“法治”起源为研究起点,探究公法私法与公权私权的内涵联系,作为厘清政策与私权自治的关系的理论基础。公权力掌握在政府手中,所以在制定上灵活性比较强,执行上强制性是政策实施的有力保障。法律是条框明确的硬性规定,它的存在给统治者和民众以安全感,但却会束缚统治者的政治思维,无法随机应变的制定政策以适应全新的国家问题。第二章对私权自治体系的自身缺陷展开分析,通过“逻辑研究方法”和“文献分析方法”对私权、私权自治、政策、民事政策等研究对象的定义进行缕析,通过“比较研究方法”对政策介入私权的客观现象在不同情况下的不同表现,进行比较和分析,更加全面的呈现政策因素介入私权自治的外观与内涵。政策作为一个非法学范畴的专业概念,必须立足于政治学理论内容加以研究。本章节从政策介入私权自治的执行强度来划分政策的类型,基于此分类对不同强制力度的政策进行分析。并基于私权的分类来开展研究私权自治,私权具体包含了人身性权利和财产性权利,两类权利的特征、属性和内容都各有不同,受到政策介入的情形也各不相同。第三章基于上文对政策介入私权自治的理论关系进行分类梳理,进而分析政策介入私权自治的合理性。当下的中国正处在社会转型时期,社会的改革对于私权自治法律制度的冲击和影响不断加深,从而导致民事成文法的漏洞凸显、政策因素介入范围过大与社会转型法律需求之间的冲突。此背景下,为避免政策在介入私权自治的过程中可能从良性违法转为恶性违法,对于政策介入的范围、限度以及政策介入私权的合理性、正当性的研究,就显得至关重要。通过对政策在程序合法与实体合法方面的分析,对介入私权的政策合理性、判断标准等问题进行探讨,从公共利益与私人利益的冲突调整,到介入私权自治的政策实体标准到政策制定的程序标准,综合设定政策介入私权自治的合理性判断标准,以期对政策介入私权的制度构建有所裨益。
[Abstract]:"the sacred private right" is the important legal spirit of the realization of private autonomy. The policy does not have the right to compulsorily intervene in the private right autonomy. However, based on the passive limitation of the law and the difference of the individual accomplishment of the law enforcers, and so on. The first chapter takes "rule of law" as the commanding point and the origin of "rule of law" as the starting point to explore the connotation of public private law and private rights. As a theoretical basis to clarify the relationship between policy and private autonomy, the public power is in the hands of the government, so it is more flexible in the formulation. Enforcement is the strong guarantee of policy implementation. The law is a clear frame of mandatory provisions, its existence gives rulers and the people a sense of security, but will constrain the rulers of political thinking. The second chapter analyzes the defects of private right autonomy system, through "logical research method" and "document analysis method" to private rights, private rights autonomy. The definition of policy, civil policy and other research objects is analyzed, and the different manifestations of the objective phenomenon of policy intervention in private rights under different circumstances are compared and analyzed through "comparative research method". More comprehensive presentation of policy factors involved in the appearance and connotation of private autonomy. Policy as a non-legal category of professional concept. This chapter divides the types of policies from the executive intensity of policy intervention in private autonomy. Based on the classification of different coercive force policy analysis. And based on the classification of private rights to carry out a study of private autonomy, private rights include the physical rights and property rights, the characteristics of the two rights. The attributes and contents are different, and the situation of policy intervention is different. Chapter three classifies the theoretical relationship between policy intervention and private autonomy based on the above. At present, China is in the period of social transformation, and the impact and influence of social reform on the legal system of private autonomy is deepening. As a result, the loopholes of civil statute law are highlighted, and the conflict between the excessive involvement of policy factors and the legal needs of social transformation. In order to avoid the policy in the process of intervention in the process of private autonomy may change from benign illegal to malignant illegal, the scope of policy intervention, limits and the rationality of policy intervention in private rights, the legitimacy of the study. Through the analysis of the policy in the aspects of procedural legality and substantive legality, this paper probes into the policy rationality and judgment criteria of the intervention of private rights, and adjusts the conflict between public interest and private interest. From the standard of policy entity to the standard of procedure of policy making, the rational judgment standard of policy intervention in private right autonomy is set synthetically, in order to benefit the system construction of policy intervention in private right.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】