论行政审批与合同效力的关系

发布时间：2018-02-04 18:24

本文关键词： 行政审批合同效力合同未生效报批义务　出处：《华中科技大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：行政审批设立目的是为了更好的实现国家对经济活动的管控。从立法及司法实践来看,我国对待审批合同的的重视程度在不断提高,相继出台司法解释对此问题进行系统阐释。然而从后续法院的判决来看,虽然对待审批合同效力的认定基本上形成了统一,但是对合同未生效的法律地位以及未生效后法律后果,不同法院之间还存在较大分歧。有些法院仍然以无效合同来对待,这不仅不利于纠纷的解决,也会对合同双方合法权益造成损害。正是基于此种现状,笔者希望通过对待审批合同中的关键问题,即审批与效力的关系进行研究。厘清审批手续对合同效力的作用,为待审批合同相关立法的完善做出贡献。本文对此问题的探讨根据以下思路进行展开:首先,对行政审批这一关键环节进行了论述。明确了行政审批的性质是对私法活动的事后监管而非确权,审批只是对合同形式审查而不是实质审查。同时为了更准确的界定其适应范围,笔者把行政审批与强制性规定和区分原则进行了对比,明确了它们之间的区别,从而限定了待审批合同中行政审批条款的适用范围。其次,通过梳理我国实务界和学术界对待审批合同的困惑,明确了我们在处理待审批合同纠纷时存在的问题及面临的主要障碍。再次,对待审批合同制度进行了域外法律研究。通过比较分析德国、日本和英美法系对此问题的不同规定,试图寻找适合我国的纠纷处理经验。最后,重点讨论了未经审批合同的效力。通过梳理我国现有的合同效力类型,明确了未生效合同与无效合同和有效合同的区别,进而论述了未生效合同的法律约束力,用报批义务条款把审批与合同效力区分开来。最终希望通过否定审批的撤销性和强制履行的路径合理解决待审批合同纠纷。
[Abstract]:In order to achieve the purpose of administrative examination and approval of the establishment of the state control of economic activity better. From the legislative and judicial practice, China's treatment of the approval of the contract the importance of improving, have issued a judicial interpretation on this issue. However, systematic interpretation from the subsequent court judgment, although recognized the validity of the contract basically treat approval the formation of a unified, but not the legal status of the contract and not after the entry into force of the legal consequences, there are large differences between different courts. Some courts still treat the invalid contract, which is not conducive to solve the dispute, it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. It is based on this situation, the author hopes to the key problem of approval in the contract, to study the relationship between that and the effectiveness of the examination and approval formalities for examination and approval. To clarify the validity of the contract, the contract is made for approval To contribute to the perfection of the law. This article discusses this issue carried out according to the following ideas: first, the administrative examination and approval of the key link are discussed. Clear the nature of administrative examination and approval after the regulation is for private activities rather than the right, only to review the contract approval form rather than substantive examination. At the same time in order to more accurately define its range, the author contrasted the provisions of mandatory administrative examination and approval and the principle of distinction, the difference between them, which restricted the scope of administrative examination and approval items pending approval of the contract. Secondly, to approve the contract through combing China's practical and academic circles are identified in the confusion, we treat approval of contract dispute problems and obstacles. Once again, with approval of the contract system of extraterritorial legal research. Through the comparative analysis of Germany, Japan and the Anglo American Law Different provisions on this issue, trying to find the dispute processing experience for China. Finally, discussed the effect of the contract without approval. By combing our country's existing contract type, the executory contract and invalid contract and the difference between effective contract, and the contract is not legally binding. In terms of the compulsory approval approval and the validity of the contract to distinguish. Eventually hope by denying approval revocation and enforce the reasonable path to solve pending contract disputes.

【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】