审判实务中房屋租赁合同无效的认定及处理

发布时间：2018-02-04 21:08

本文关键词： 房屋租赁合同合同无效释明权　出处：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：房屋租赁是日常生活中的常见现象。在签订房屋租赁合同时,承租人与出租人只会关心租金数额、租赁期限及如何支付等,而忽视了出租房屋是否违章建筑、是否经过消防验收等问题,造成双方发生纠纷时,合同的效力就成为首要问题,所以最高人民法院于2009年9月1日正式施行了《关于审理城镇房屋租赁合同纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》。但随着时间推移,法院在审理房屋租赁合同时不断发现新的情况,超出了司法解释的范围,房屋租赁合同的效力认定成为审判实务中的一大难点。本文首先分析了房屋租赁合同的定义及其特征,阐述了城镇房屋租赁合同被认定无效的情形并就乡村房屋租赁合同如何认定问题提出笔者的个人建议。其次,本文结合当前法院审判实务中对房屋租赁合同效力认定的相关案例,阐述法院应该对房屋租赁合同的效力实行国家干预,可以依职权进行主动审理,而主动的审查的范围及尺度则需要结合房屋租赁合同被认定无效的情况进行分析,对于法律、司法解释明确规定合同应认定无效情形,法院应当主动审查,而本文所论述的常见的被认定合同无效的情形,根据双方的诉辩意见,视情况而定是否需要启动审查。最后,本文探讨了在当事人对于房屋租赁合同效力不存在争议的情况下,法官在法庭调查中发现合同应认定无效时应如何处理。笔者认为,法院要适当的引入释明权,向当事人释明合同被认定无效的法律后果,并借鉴选择性理论,就如何释明及释明的范围、尺度进行分析,进而提出笔者的建议,以统一裁决尺度。
[Abstract]:Housing lease is a common phenomenon in daily life. When signing a house lease contract, the lessee and lessor will only care about the amount of rent, the term of lease and how to pay, while ignoring whether the building rent is illegal or not. The effectiveness of the contract becomes the most important issue when the two sides have a dispute whether or not they have passed the fire control acceptance and so on. Therefore, in September 1st 2009, the Supreme people's Court formally put into effect the explanation on the specific application of the law in the case of housing lease contract disputes in cities and towns, but with the passage of time. The court in the hearing of housing lease contracts continue to find new situations, beyond the scope of judicial interpretation. The validity of the house lease contract has become a major difficulty in the trial practice. Firstly, this paper analyzes the definition and characteristics of the housing lease contract. This paper expounds the situation that the lease contract of urban housing is deemed invalid and puts forward the author's personal suggestions on how to identify the lease contract of rural house. Secondly. This article combines the current court trial practice to the housing lease contract validity confirmation related case, elaborated the court should carry on the national intervention to the housing lease contract validity, may carry on the trial according to the authority initiative. On the other hand, the scope and scale of the active review need to be combined with the situation that the housing lease contract is found invalid. For the law, judicial interpretation clearly stipulates that the contract should be considered invalid, the court should take the initiative to review. According to the pleadings of both parties, whether the review should be initiated or not is necessary according to the common circumstances discussed in this paper. This paper discusses how to deal with the validity of the house lease contract when the parties concerned do not dispute the validity of the contract, and the judge finds that the contract should be found to be invalid in the court investigation. The author thinks that the court should introduce the right of interpretation appropriately. This paper explains to the parties the legal consequences of the invalidation of the contract, and analyzes how to explain the contract, the scope and the scale of the interpretation by using the selective theory, and then puts forward the author's suggestion in order to unify the criterion of the ruling.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】