作者意图、事实与作品的可版权性——以古籍整理相关案件为主线

发布时间：2018-02-05 16:45

本文关键词： 古籍整理作者意图事实独创性显著改变死海卷宗案　出处：《政治与法律》2015年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：美国学者尼莫提出的"作者意图"规则主张,复原古籍的意图使得古籍整理成果成为不受保护的事实,或者使其成为整理者有限的表达形式,从而不受版权保护。该主张不仅得到了我国学者的支持,而且在我国司法实践中也产生了广泛影响。然而,从作者意图出发分析作品的可版权性,脱离了传统的版权法规则,它以作者意图取代了作品的独创性分析,混淆了事实的发现与事实的表达,也未明晰作品的独创性与受保护范围的界限。作者意图可以成为作品可版权性判断的考虑因素,但并非是绝对条件。复原古籍是否构成演绎作品,应回归演绎作品独创性的传统判断方法即"显著改变"标准。对于非独创性古籍整理的保护,则需要立法创设新的邻接权制度。
[Abstract]:The rule of "author's intention" put forward by American scholar Nemo claims that the intention of restoring ancient books makes the achievements of ancient books unprotected or a limited form of expression. This proposition is not only supported by Chinese scholars, but also has a wide influence in our judicial practice. However, the author intends to analyze the copyright of the works. It breaks away from the traditional copyright law rules, it replaces the original analysis of the works with the author's intention, and confuses the discovery of the facts with the expression of the facts. The author's intention can become the consideration factor of the copyright judgment of the work, but it is not the absolute condition, whether or not the restoration of ancient books constitutes a deductive work. The standard of "remarkable change" should be returned to the traditional judgment method of the originality of deductive works, and for the protection of the arrangement of non-original ancient books, it is necessary to legislate to create a new system of neighboring right.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】