过境货物知识产权边境保护措施研究
发布时间:2018-02-14 04:53
本文关键词: 过境货物 知识产权边境保护措施 地域性 出处:《海南大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着我国对外开放的进一步深入,特别是近年来上海、广东等自由贸易试验区的批准设立,有关我国过境货物的知识产权边境措施保护问题变得越来越突出。但国内关于过境货物的知识产权保护问题研究还处于空白阶段。基于此,本文试在对有关国际条约进行分析的基础上,结合相关司法实践,并对知识产权保护的基本理论进行阐述,以期为我国的边境保护措施法律完善提供一些愚见。 文章第一部分是对过境货物知识产权边境措施的基本概述,首先从国内外相关法条中总结出了过境货物的定义,然后介绍了知识产权边境保护制度及其与过境货物的关系,并指出目前国际社会对边境保护措施是否应适用过境货物并没有明确统一的定论。 第二部分分析了国际条约及有关文件对过境货物边境保护措施的规定。首先探讨了GATT项下有关过境自由的规定,并得出其不能为过境国对过境货物实施边境保护措施提供国际法依据。其次,从立法宗旨、保护范围、适用环节等方面详细分析了TRIPS协定下的有关边境措施规定,重点探讨了TRIPS协定的立法初衷以及注解13把过境货物排除在边境保护措施在外的做法。随后对目前国际上,TRIPS-plus的条约进行了分析。从适用环节、准据法适用、担保制度及补救措施等方面详细分析了ATCA对TRIPS协定下权利人和被申请人之间的平衡关系的破坏。紧接着介绍了目前正在谈判中的的TPP谈判中有关知识产权的边境执法措施甚至明确将边境措施的适用范围扩大至转口货物。最后得出知识产权国际保护的TRIPS-plus格局已经成为各个国家必须面对的事实。 第三部分是过境货物知识产权边境措施的法理分析。首先,是对过境货物法律性质的分析,对当前的“生产假设”和“域外假定”理论进行了批判分析。其次,指出知识产权的私权性是知识产权的理论基础,边境措施作为对私权利的公权救济手段,其合法性应以私权为基础的。另外,阐述了知识产权边境保护措施的实施应尊重知识产权的地域性原则,最后,分析了知识产权侵权昀法律适用问题。 第四部分对我国的过境货物边境措施的完善提出建议。首先介绍了我国边境措施的立法现状,指出其存在的不足与僵化的地方。其后从平衡知识产权保护与贸易自由的关系、适用条件、保护模式等方面对我国过境货物边境措施的完善提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the further deepening of China's opening to the outside world, especially in recent years, Shanghai, Guangdong and other free trade experimental areas have been approved and established. The protection of intellectual property border measures for transit goods in China has become more and more prominent. However, the domestic research on intellectual property protection of transit goods is still in a blank stage. Based on the analysis of the relevant international treaties and the relevant judicial practice, this paper expounds the basic theory of the protection of intellectual property rights in order to provide some humble opinions for the perfection of the law of the border protection measures in our country. The first part of the article is a basic overview of the border measures of intellectual property rights of goods in transit. Firstly, the definition of transit goods is summarized from the relevant domestic and foreign laws, and then the system of border protection of intellectual property rights and its relationship with transit goods are introduced. It is pointed out that there is no clear and uniform conclusion on whether border protection measures should be applied to transit goods in the international community. The second part analyzes the provisions of international treaties and related documents on border protection measures for goods in transit. First of all, it discusses the provisions on the freedom of transit under GATT. And it can not provide international legal basis for transit countries to implement border protection measures for transit goods. Secondly, the relevant border measures under the TRIPS Agreement are analyzed in detail from the aspects of legislative purpose, scope of protection, applicable links, etc. The legislative intent of the TRIPS Agreement and the practice of excluding goods in transit from border protection measures in Note 13 are discussed in detail. Subsequently, the current international treaties of TRIPS-plus are analyzed. In terms of application, applicable law is applied. This paper analyzes in detail the breach of the balance between the right holder and the respondent under the TRIPS Agreement by ATCA from the aspects of security system and remedies. Then it introduces the frontier of intellectual property rights in the TPP negotiation which is currently under negotiation. Law enforcement measures even explicitly extend the application of border measures to transit goods. Finally, the conclusion that the TRIPS-plus pattern of international protection of intellectual property rights has become a fact that every country must face. The third part is the legal analysis of border measures of intellectual property rights of transit goods. Firstly, it analyzes the legal nature of transit goods, and criticizes the current theories of "production hypothesis" and "extraterritorial hypothesis". It is pointed out that the private right of intellectual property is the theoretical basis of intellectual property, and border measures, as a means of public right relief to private rights, should be based on private rights. This paper expounds the regional principle of intellectual property rights should be respected in the implementation of intellectual property rights border protection measures, and finally, analyzes the legal application of intellectual property rights infringement. Part 4th puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of border measures for transit goods in China. Firstly, it introduces the current legislation of border measures in China, and points out their shortcomings and inflexibility. Then, it balances the relationship between the protection of intellectual property rights and the freedom of trade. Application conditions, protection model and other aspects of China's transit goods border measures to improve the recommendations.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.221;D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 聂士海;;商标平行进口在我国的实践与争议[J];今日财富(中国知识产权);2010年08期
2 刘中伟;沈家文;;跨太平洋伙伴关系协议(TPP):研究前沿与架构[J];当代亚太;2012年01期
3 张乃根;;论WTO争端解决的条约解释[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
4 朱玛;;超TRIPS规则:ACTA背景下我国知识产权的边境措施与应对[J];对外经贸实务;2012年10期
5 严桂珍;;我国平行进口法律规制情况——以商标平行进口为视角[J];今日财富(中国知识产权);2010年08期
6 姜文学;;TPP在美国重塑国际贸易秩序中的双重功能[J];财经问题研究;2012年12期
7 杜颖;;中国(上海)自由贸易试验区知识产权保护的构想[J];法学;2014年01期
8 丁伟;;中国(上海)自由贸易试验区法制保障的探索与实践[J];法学;2013年11期
9 晏凌煜;唐春;;中国(上海)自由贸易试验区内涵及其涉及的知识产权保护问题初析[J];电子知识产权;2014年02期
10 杨静;;基于内生需求与外向视野的上海自贸区知识产权保护构想[J];电子知识产权;2014年02期
,本文编号:1509917
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1509917.html