未成年明星人格权商业化利用的限制
本文选题:未成年明星 切入点:人格权商业化利用 出处:《中国政法大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:近年来未成年明星的人格权商业化利用的现象呈现井喷式增长和产业化发展的趋势,为未成年明星本人及其经纪公司、监护人及商家等都带来了可观的商业利益。但由于未成年明星的民事行为能力受限,加上未成年明星身心的特殊性,心智上、社会经验上、对不利影响的认识程度上的不足,其人格权商业化利用存在普遍被侵权的情况。而相关政策法规的缺位和学界的意见分歧加剧了这一情况。因此,无论是基于人格权本身的内在要求——权利属性要求,还是基于保护未成年明星的要求,或者是从公序良俗的角度出发,都有对未成年明星人格权商业化利用加以合理规范性限制的需要。本文从实践出发,对未成年明星人格权商业化的利用进行类型化的剖析,在对未成年明星及其特殊的身心特点进行分析之后,在比较法研究的基础上,提出对未成年明星人格权商业化利用限制的基本原则分为两类,一类是以未成年人利益最大化为中心的未成年保护类原则;一类是以公序良俗为中心的人格权限制原则。基于以上原则,本文根据未成年明星人格权的类型化,针对不同人格权的商业化利用,详细阐述了具体的限制内容及其操作方式,并最终从未成年人保护法修订和未成年明星保护机制的建构角度提出了对未成年明星人格权商业化利用进行限制的完善建议。本文分为三章。第一章是问题的提出及概念的厘清,首先提出了本文的研究问题,对国内外研究现状做了概述,对相关概念进行了相近概念的辨析及对比,并对选择进行基础理论构建的三个概念——未成年明星、人格权商业化利用和限制进行了界定和论证。第二章明确了问题的内容,并对未成年明星人格权商业化利用的主体、客体、内容和利用方式进行了类型化的梳理,为下文论述提供了基础的框架支撑。第三章回归问题,回应了对未成年明星人格权商业化利用是否需要限制,为什么要限制这些问题,并通过主体的特殊性来论证正当性;以无限制的危害性来论证紧迫性和必要性。然后在此基础上,回答了以下问题:限制哪些主体?限制哪些权利的商业性使用?以什么原则和标准进行限制?依据哪些现行法律进行限制?还需要增加什么制度设计来进行限制?限制的目的何如?本文通过回应这些问题,结合比较法分析,针对在未成年明星人格权商业化过程中的每一个主体、每一种具体人格权的限制进行了细化,具体构建起了未成年明星人格权商业化利用的限制体系,并建议从立法上采用特别立法或特殊条款进行规定,明确权利边界、设置后悔权,并设定差别化的限制方式;从司法上,坚持因案制宜,但价值倾向应当统一;从体制上,建议建立专门的未成年明星行业协会和监督机构,坚持立法、司法、行业协会、未成年人保护组织、家庭、学校多方联动,以构建完整的未成年明星人格权商业化利用的限制制度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of commercial utilization of personality rights of underage stars has shown a trend of blowout growth and industrialization development, for the underage stars themselves and their brokerage companies. Guardians and businesses have brought considerable commercial benefits. However, due to the limited civil capacity of underage stars, coupled with the particularity of their bodies and minds, their mental and social experiences, the extent of their understanding of the adverse effects is insufficient. The commercial use of personality rights is generally infringed, and the absence of relevant policies and regulations and the differences of opinion in academic circles aggravate this situation. Therefore, whether based on the inherent requirement of personality rights-the property of rights, Or is it based on the requirement of protecting the minor star, or from the angle of public order and good custom, there is the need to restrict the commercial use of the personality right of the minor star reasonably and normatively. On the basis of comparative study, this paper analyzes the commercial use of personality rights of underage stars, and analyzes the characteristics of juvenile stars and their special physical and mental characteristics. The basic principles of limiting the commercial use of personality rights of minor stars are divided into two categories: one is the minor protection principle centered on the maximization of the interests of minors; One is the restriction principle of personality right centered on public order and good custom. Based on the above principles, according to the typology of personality right of underage star, aiming at the commercial utilization of different personality right, this paper elaborates the concrete restriction content and its operation mode. And finally from the minor protection law revision and the minor star protection mechanism construction angle proposed to the minor star personality right commercialization use to carry on the consummation proposal. This article is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is the question raised. The clarification of concepts, First of all, it puts forward the research problems of this paper, summarizes the current research situation at home and abroad, differentiates and compares the related concepts, and makes a comparison of the three concepts of choosing the underage star, which is constructed by the basic theory. The second chapter clarifies the content of the problem, and sorts out the subject, object, content and utilization mode of the commercial use of personality right of the minor star. The third chapter is the regression problem, which responds to whether the commercial use of personality rights of underage stars need to be restricted, why to restrict these problems, and to demonstrate the legitimacy through the particularity of the subject; On the basis of the discussion of the urgency and necessity of the harmfulness of unlimited limitation, the following questions are answered: which subjects are restricted? Which rights are restricted for commercial use? What principles and standards are used to limit this? Under what existing laws are restrictions imposed? What additional system design is needed to limit this? The purpose of restriction He Ru? In response to these questions, combined with comparative analysis, this paper focuses on each subject in the process of commercializing the personality rights of underage stars, and the limitations of each specific personality right. It constructs the restriction system of the commercial use of the personality right of the minor star, and proposes to adopt special legislation or special clause to stipulate in the legislation, clear the right boundary, set up the right of regret, and set up the differential restriction mode; From the judicial point of view, we should stick to the case system, but the tendency of value should be unified; institutionally, we should set up special associations and supervisory bodies for underage star industries, uphold legislation, judicature, trade associations, organizations for the protection of minors, and families, In order to construct a complete restriction system of commercial utilization of personality right of underage stars, schools are linked in many ways.
【学位授予单位】:中国政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;法律规定对未成年工的保护[J];农民科技培训;2010年06期
2 胡志鑫,陈立林;未成年工维权问题探析[J];玉林师范学院学报;2004年06期
3 侯典牧;李红文;闫俊林;;美国未成年工的雇佣规定及其管理方式的个案研究[J];中外企业家;2010年10期
4 贾俊玲;《劳动法》对女职工和未成年工特殊权益的保障[J];中国工运;1995年01期
5 言午;未成年工不能从事哪些劳动?[J];现代技能开发;1995年11期
6 陈业雷;;谁来保护未成年工[J];科学新生活;2014年04期
7 恭平;;未成年工上岗前体检费由单位承担[J];当代工人;2008年08期
8 曹登权,丁德早;“未成年工”与童工有何区别[J];思想政治课教学;2002年Z1期
9 龚薪晔;;论未成年工维权难[J];法制与社会;2013年01期
10 ;未成年工特殊保护规定[J];劳动保护;1995年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;女职工、未成年工劳动保护有何规定[N];河南科技报;2001年
2 胡彩肖;劳动合同的约定不能损害未成年工权利[N];工人日报;2007年
3 李亮;大家都来关心未成年工的健康权[N];检察日报;2001年
4 叶静漪 北京大学法学院教授;企业应保障未成年工享有特殊保护权利[N];工人日报;2006年
5 王玉信;法律给予未成年工的特殊保护[N];中国妇女报;2000年
6 本报记者 刘银昌;莫让稚嫩的双肩“超载”[N];淮南日报;2006年
7 通讯员 刘志伟 苏鹏 曾庆生;市人社局推进未成年工特殊劳动保护[N];驻马店日报;2010年
8 ;用人单位必须遵守未成年工特殊保护规定[N];唐山劳动日报;2005年
9 王三虎 王会;关爱未来 执法维权[N];张掖日报;2007年
10 陈小毛 赖德亮;法律对未成年工有哪些特殊保护[N];检察日报;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 薛春雨;未成年明星人格权商业化利用的限制[D];中国政法大学;2017年
2 张闽湘;未成年工职业生涯服务的小组工作探索[D];云南大学;2014年
,本文编号:1631026
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1631026.html