专利权用尽的售后限制研究——以专利权保留规则的构建为视角

发布时间：2018-03-20 17:10

本文选题：专利权用尽　切入点：售后限制　出处：《知识产权》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：专利权用尽原则是对专利权排他性的一种重要限制。专利权用尽售后限制的法律效果争议主要表现为,专利产品销售时所附限制性条件能否阻却专利权用尽,对由此存在专利权的绝对用尽和相对用尽两种不同模式,应当借鉴合同法上的所有权保留制度,建立专利用尽框架下的"专利权保留"规则。基于专利权用尽售后限制的理论,内在限制论排除了"专利权保留",而默示许可论则允许,并更为符合专利权用尽中的当事人意思自治。根据限制形式和内容的不同,专利权用尽的售后限制和专利权的保留具有不同的表现。应当承认专利权用尽售后限制在专利法上的效力,违背该限制条件将构成专利侵权与违约责任的竞合,从而强化对专利权人的保护。
[Abstract]:The principle of patent exhaustion is an important limitation to patent exclusivity. With regard to the two different modes of absolute exhaustion and relative exhaustion of patent right, we should draw lessons from the system of retention of title in contract law, and establish the rules of "patent reservation" under the framework of patent exhaustion, which is based on the theory of the limitation of patent exhaustion after sale. The inherent restriction theory excludes the "patent right reservation", while the implied license theory allows, and is more consistent with the autonomy of the party's meaning in the exhaustion of patent rights, depending on the form and content of the restriction, The post-sale limitation of the exhaustion of the patent right and the reservation of the patent right have different manifestations. The validity of the limitation of the exhaustion of the patent right in the patent law should be recognized, and the breach of the restriction condition will constitute the concurrence between the infringement of the patent right and the liability for breach of contract. So as to strengthen the protection of the patentee.
【作者单位】：中南大学法学院;南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“知识产权默示许可研究”(编号:11YBA311) 湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目“协同创新战略与专利制度发展研究”(编号:13K009)
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】