论FRAND承诺的性质及其价值

发布时间：2018-03-28 17:10

本文选题：标准必要专利　切入点：FRAND承诺　出处：《电子知识产权》2017年07期

【摘要】：FRAND承诺是标准制定组织为专利权人创设的一种普遍性的义务。一方面,标准制定组织通过创设这种义务可以避免自身卷入具体的标准必要专利纠纷,另一方面,这种普遍性的义务能够为标准实施者提起诉讼进入司法解决通道提供一块"跳板",为标准实施者提供了请求的依据。FRAND承诺的价值不在于直接确定具体的标准必要专利许可费,而是通过FRAND这样模糊的表述使得标准制定组织、专利权人和标准实施者都能够实现利益寄托。当发生纠纷以后,FRAND能够为纠纷的解决提供原则性的指导,但司法机关无法直接依据FRAND原则确定具体的许可费,标准必要专利许可费需要法院在个案中综合考虑各种因素进而将抽象的FRAND原则具体化后才能够确定。
[Abstract]:FRAND commitment is a universal obligation created for patentees by standard-setting organizations. On the one hand, standard-setting organizations can avoid being involved in specific patent disputes by creating such obligations, on the other hand, This universal obligation can provide a "springboard" for standard implementers to initiate proceedings into the judicial settlement channel and provide the standard implementer with the basis for a request. The value of the FRAND commitment does not lie in directly determining the specific patent licence fee necessary for the standard, Rather, the vague expression of FRAND enables standard-setting organizations, patentees and standard implementers to achieve benefit sustenance. When disputes arise, FRAND can provide principled guidance for the resolution of disputes. However, the judicial organ can not directly determine the specific license fee according to the FRAND principle. The standard necessary patent license fee can be determined only after the court considers all kinds of factors comprehensively in the case and then concretizes the abstract FRAND principle.
【作者单位】：中国青年政治学院法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“标准必要专利反垄断规制研究”(项目编号:16CFX050)
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】