论我国《商标法》中法定赔偿制度的完善

发布时间：2018-04-26 10:12

本文选题：商标法 + 法定赔偿制度　；参考：《天津师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：法定赔偿制度是商标权侵权损害赔偿中一项独立而重要的制度,自其产生之初就一直扮演着重要的角色,由于商标侵权不同于普通民事侵权,普通民事侵权中对侵权造成的损害是容易计算的,但是在商标侵权中,受到侵害的客体是信息产权,这就决定了商标侵权具有取证难、损失难以证明的特征。权利人难以举证证明自己所受损失的具体数额,法官也就难以判定侵权人的赔偿数额,长此以往,不仅权利人的利益难以得到保护,也造成人民法院诉讼资源的浪费,在这种情况下,法定赔偿制度的设计解决了这一难题,在侵权损失难以计算时,人民法院可以运用法定赔偿推算权利人的经济损失。尽管法定赔偿在商标侵权损害赔偿中地位特殊,但还是无法掩盖其一直以来存在的问题,法定赔偿因其使用泛化、赔偿数额低、法官自由裁量权过大而广受批判,究其根本,主要根源于我国法定赔偿制度起步晚、发展快,立法尚不成熟。本文结合理论和司法实践对我国《商标法》中定赔偿制度存在的问题进行了分析,并提出了三方面的完善建议。本文第一部分主要论述了我国法定赔偿参考因素立法规定不完善而导致的司法实践中的具体问题,并提出了自己的完善建议；本文第二部分主要结合我国法定赔偿计量标准的理论研究现状和国外立法经验,提出我国应当建立以权利客体为标准的法定赔偿计量单位；本文最后一部分针对我国当事人适用法定赔偿的具体适用时间、适用顺序提出了完善建议。
[Abstract]:The legal compensation system is an independent and important system in the compensation for trademark infringement damage. It has been playing an important role since the beginning of its emergence, because trademark infringement is different from ordinary civil tort. The damage caused by the common civil tort is easy to calculate, but in the trademark infringement, the object being infringed is the information property right, which determines that the trademark infringement is difficult to obtain evidence and the loss is difficult to prove. It is difficult for the obligee to prove the specific amount of the loss, the judge will find it difficult to determine the amount of compensation of the infringer. In the long run, not only the interests of the obligee cannot be protected, but also the litigation resources of the people's court will be wasted. In this case, the design of the legal compensation system solves this problem. When the tort loss is difficult to calculate, the people's court can use the legal compensation to calculate the economic loss of the obligee. Although the legal compensation has a special status in the trademark infringement damages, it still can not cover up its existing problems. The legal compensation has been criticized because of its extensive use, low compensation amount, and the judges' discretion is too large to be criticized. The main root is that the legal compensation system of our country starts late, develops quickly, and the legislation is not mature. Based on the theory and judicial practice, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the compensation system in Trademark Law of our country, and puts forward three suggestions to perfect it. The first part of this paper mainly discusses the specific problems in the judicial practice caused by the imperfect legislative provisions of the legal compensation reference factors in our country, and puts forward its own suggestions for perfection. The second part of this paper mainly combines the current situation of theoretical research and foreign legislative experience of the legal compensation measurement standard in China, and puts forward that our country should establish a statutory compensation measurement unit based on the object of right. In the last part of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to apply the legal compensation.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】