违约责任中的精神损害赔偿研究

发布时间：2018-06-16 13:32

本文选题：精神损害 + 违约责任　；参考：《华东政法大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文旨在探讨在我国现行法律体系下,违约精神损害赔偿的合理性、具体判断标准以及赔偿制度的构建。本文的研究领域主要为合同领域,另附带涉及部分侵权与违约的边际领域。第一章首先考察我国关于精神损害赔偿的相关立法规定以及违约精神损害赔偿的相关案例,并依据民法的基本逻辑巧妙地提出整篇文章将要论述的问题。其次,以最基本的损害、精神等词的基本词义为前提,探明精神损害的概念,说明精神损害与非财产损害、人身损害等概念的关系。最后,提出精神损害无形性、主体的特殊性、主观性和客观性、独立性等特征。第二章着重考察大陆法系和英美法系主要国家关于违约精神损害赔偿问题的相关立法以及判例,并最终总结这些国家关于违约精神损害赔偿立法模式和相关制度的设计。第三章为违约精神损害赔偿的合理性分析。首先提出违约精神损害赔偿的否定性学说并做简要评述。其次,提出合同与侵权的划分为民法中一个基础划分,其划分依据的是他们各自所保护的利益。合同所保护的为期待利益,而侵权保护的是固有利益。并对期待利益与固有利益的概念,各自所包含的利益成分进行说明。再次,利用合同保护期待利益以及可预见性的相关规定从而来界定违反约定所进行的关于精神补偿是否合理。合同的保护法权益中内容是合乎可预见这一性质的规定的期待利益,精神利益属于期待利益,但并非所有精神利益的损害是违约方于合同订立时可以预见的,仅有违约方于订立合同时依据一般理性人的标准可预见性精神利益的损害受合同保护。最后,讨论加害给付与责任竞合时的精神损害赔偿问题。合同同样可保护固有利益,但是目前依请求权自由竞合说则固有精神利益与合同期待利益的保护不能并存。而请求权相互影响说很好得解决了这一问题,使违约中固有精神利益的赔偿成为可能。第四章为我国违约精神损害赔偿的制度构建。首先是立法模式的选择。其次是违约精神损害赔偿的详细组成要素的规划。在最后说明的是关于当违反约定是应当谈及的如何限制的问题。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to discuss the rationality of compensation for spiritual damages of breach of contract under the current legal system of our country, the concrete judgment standard and the construction of compensation system. The research field of this paper is mainly contract field, and it also involves some marginal areas of tort and breach of contract. In the first chapter, the author reviews the relevant legislative provisions on compensation for spiritual damage and the relevant cases of compensation for breach of contract, and skillfully puts forward the issues to be discussed in the whole article according to the basic logic of civil law. Secondly, on the premise of the basic word meaning of the most basic damage and spirit, this paper explores the concept of spiritual damage, and explains the relationship between mental damage and non-property damage, personal injury and so on. Finally, the intangibility of mental damage, the particularity of subject, subjectivity and objectivity, independence and so on are put forward. The second chapter focuses on the civil law system and Anglo-American legal system of the main countries on breach of mental damage compensation related legislation and jurisprudence, and finally summed up these countries on the breach of mental damage compensation legislative model and related system design. The third chapter is the reasonable analysis of the compensation for breach of contract. Firstly, the negative theory of compensation for breach of contract is put forward and briefly reviewed. Secondly, the division of contract and tort is a basic division in civil law, which is based on their respective interests. The contract protects the expected interest, while the tort protects the inherent interest. And the concept of expected interest and inherent interest, each containing the interests of the elements are explained. Thirdly, using the contract to protect the expected interests and predictability of the relevant provisions to define whether the breach of the spirit of compensation is reasonable. The contents of the protection rights and interests of the contract are the expected interests which accord with the provisions of the nature of predictability, the spiritual interests belong to the expected interests, but not all the damage of the spiritual interests can be foreseen by the breaching party at the time of the conclusion of the contract. Only the breaching party is protected by contract when concluding the contract according to the standard of the general rational person. Finally, the problem of compensation for mental damage is discussed. The contract can also protect the inherent interests, but the protection of the inherent spiritual interests and the expected interests of the contract cannot coexist according to the theory of free competition and cooperation of the right of claim at present. The theory of mutual influence of right of claim solves this problem well and makes it possible to compensate for the inherent mental interests in breach of contract. The fourth chapter is the system construction of the compensation for breach of contract spirit damage in our country. The first is the choice of legislative model. Secondly, the detailed composition of compensation for breach of contract spiritual damage planning. At the end of the note is the question of how limitations should be addressed when breaching a convention.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】