新类型担保法律效力问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-21 14:28

本文选题：新类型担保 + 担保物权　；参考：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着经济的持续发展以及互联网+等新领域、新技术的异军突起,人们生活水平不断提升使得需求更加旺盛、经营模式更加多样,进而催生出多种新的担保方式。这些新的担保方式因为更具时代特点,自然给理论和实践带来诸多困扰。从理论层面看,它的形态与法律关系中有很多难以用传统的典型担保理念予以解释。新的担保形式有很多,哪些应该归类于担保物权来处理,而哪些又应该将其作为一般合同对待,涉及到开放式担保物权立法模式中如何判断调整具体担保法律关系时的法律依据问题。基于上述问题,本文拟采用文献研究、社会学等方法,对问题进行对比分析和演绎归纳,从以下几个方面展开探讨。第一,本文会从新类型担保的概念着手,通过对将商铺租赁权及巡游车经营权作为担保标的的操作模式进行分析,探究新类型担保的性质及作用。通过介绍当事人、法院、金融机构对新类型担保的态度以及典型案例,对其进行较为全面的概括,为后文的论证做好铺垫。第二,有针对性地剖析担保物权的特征,通过抵押权与权利质权的对比分析,介绍新类型担保的抵押与质押的权属争议。第三,以权利源泉为标准对新类型担保进行分类,分析权利源泉为公权力的新类型担保的去留。同时以商铺租赁权质押、巡游车出租权质押为例,探究我国新类型担保的公示方式及法律效力,提出实现新类型担保法律效力的操作模式之构想。第四,在正确认识我国担保物权种类逐渐增多这一现状的前提下,结合现行法律规定及前述构想,对完善我国新类型担保的法律规制提出建议。司法机关应认可新类型担保的权利质权效力,并统一裁判标准;立法机关应明确新类型担保的公示方式及实现形式,并加强相关法律知识及政策的宣传。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of economy and the new fields such as the Internet, the rising of new technology makes the demand more vigorous, the management mode more diverse, and then gives birth to a variety of new ways of guarantee. These new ways of guarantee, because of the characteristics of the times, naturally bring a lot of problems to theory and practice. Theoretically, its form and legal relationship are difficult to explain by the traditional typical guarantee idea. There are many new forms of security, which should be classified as security interests and which should be treated as general contracts, This paper deals with the legal basis of how to judge and adjust the specific legal relationship of security in the legislative model of open security right. Based on the above problems, this paper intends to use literature research, sociology and other methods to analyze and deduce the problems from the following aspects. First, this article will start from the new type guarantee concept, through the analysis to the shop rental right and the tour vehicle management right as the guarantee object operation pattern, will explore the new type guarantee nature and the function. By introducing the attitude of the parties, courts and financial institutions to the new type of guarantee and typical cases, the author makes a more comprehensive summary of it, which will pave the way for the following argumentation. Secondly, this paper analyzes the characteristics of security real right, and introduces the dispute between mortgage and pledge of new type of security through the comparative analysis of mortgage and pledge of right. Thirdly, the new type of security is classified according to the source of right, and the new type of guarantee with the source of right as the source of public power is analyzed. At the same time, taking the pledge of shop lease right and tour car rental right as an example, this paper probes into the publicity mode and legal effect of the new type of guarantee in our country, and puts forward the idea of realizing the legal effect of the new type of guarantee. Fourthly, on the premise of the correct understanding of the increasing types of security interest in our country, combined with the existing laws and regulations and the aforementioned ideas, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the legal regulation of the new type of guarantee in our country. The judicial organ should recognize the validity of the pledge of rights of the new type of guarantee and unify the judgment standard, and the legislature should make clear the way of publicizing and realizing the new type of guarantee, and strengthen the propaganda of relevant legal knowledge and policy.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】