网络服务提供者著作权侵权问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-26 12:20

本文选题：网络服务提供者 + 著作权　；参考：《贵州师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：互联网从诞生至今尚不足五十年,却已经成为推动社会发展的强劲动力,人们在享受网络带来便利的同时也承受着网络带来的伤害。随着网络技术的不断更新,著作权人对作品传播的控制力越来越弱。盗版作品的猖獗,使得著作权人遭受巨大的损失,事后追究侵权人的责任,很难填补著作权人所遭受的损失。为了保障著作权人的利益,网络服务提供者往往必须承担赔偿责任。在承担责任方面,网络服务提供者在赔偿之后通常无法进行追偿,这无疑暴露出连带责任在网络侵权纠纷中适用的缺陷。在主观过错的认定方面,明知与应知标准过于抽象,导致司法实践中适用结果不尽相同。由于网络服务提供者在网络活动中扮演的角色各异,在责任认定与承担方面便应该有所区分。因此,本文从各类不同网络服务提供者入手,对网络服务提供者的法律地位、责任认定与承担、特定义务、避风港规则等问题进行探讨,提出完善规制网络著作权侵权问题相关法律规范的建议。本文在体系上共分为六个部分,具体安排如下:引言部分主要介绍本文的研究背景以及研究意义。第一章是“网络著作权侵权与网络服务提供者的概述”,共分为三个部分。第一部分主要阐述了网络著作权侵权的基本内涵,包括直接侵权与间接侵权;第二部分介绍了网络服务提供者的概念与分类;第三部分是分析不同网络服务提供者的法律地位。第二章是“网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的认定”,共分为五个部分。第一部分为网络服务提供者侵权责任理论基础的发展;第二部分为网络服务提供者著作权侵权一般归责原则;第三部分具体探讨不同网络服务提供者“帮助侵权”的认定规则;第四部分介绍网络服务提供者侵权责任的形式;第五部分是网络服务提供者具体的责任承担方式。第三章是“网络服务提供者的‘避风港’”,共分为三个部分。第一部分是对避风港规则的简要概括;第二部分是研究避风港规则的具体适用问题;第三部分是剖析网络服务提供者特定的义务。第四章是“完善规制网络著作权侵权问题法律规范的建议”,共分为三个部分。第一部分介绍我国现有的法律现状;第二部分是分析我国现行立法存在的问题;第三部分是提出完善规制网络侵权行为规定的建议。文章的最后一部分为结束语。
[Abstract]:The Internet has been less than 50 years since its birth, but it has become a powerful driving force to promote social development. People enjoy the convenience of the network but also suffer the harm of the network. With the continuous updating of network technology, copyright owners have weaker and weaker control over the dissemination of works. The rampant pirated works make the copyright owners suffer huge losses. It is difficult to compensate for the losses suffered by copyright owners. In order to protect the interests of copyright owners, network service providers often have to bear liability for compensation. In the aspect of liability, network service providers usually can not recover compensation after compensation, which undoubtedly exposes the defects of joint liability in network tort disputes. In the cognizance of subjective fault, the criterion of knowing and knowing is too abstract, which leads to different results in judicial practice. Since network service providers play different roles in network activities, they should distinguish between responsibility and responsibility. Therefore, this paper starts with various kinds of network service providers, discusses the legal status of network service providers, responsibility determination and commitment, specific obligations, safe haven rules and other issues. Put forward to improve the network copyright infringement related legal norms. This paper is divided into six parts: the introduction mainly introduces the research background and significance. The first chapter is an overview of network copyright infringement and network service providers, which is divided into three parts. The first part mainly expounds the basic connotation of network copyright infringement, including direct infringement and indirect infringement; the second part introduces the concept and classification of network service providers; the third part is to analyze the legal status of different network service providers. The second chapter is the confirmation of copyright infringement liability of network service provider, which is divided into five parts. The first part is the development of the theoretical foundation of the network service provider's tort liability; the second part is the general liability principle of the network service provider's copyright infringement; the third part concretely discusses the identification rules of the different network service provider's "help infringement"; The fourth part introduces the form of tort liability of network service provider, and the fifth part is the specific liability assumption way of network service provider. The third chapter is the "safe haven" of network service provider, which is divided into three parts. The first part is a brief summary of the safe haven rules; the second part is to study the specific application of the haven rules; the third part is to analyze the specific obligations of network service providers. The fourth chapter is the suggestion of perfecting the legal regulation of network copyright infringement, which is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the current legal situation of our country; the second part is to analyze the existing problems of our current legislation; the third part is to put forward suggestions to improve the regulation of network tort. The last part of the article is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【共引文献】