不动产善意取得立法完善与适用难点问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-10 09:33

本文选题：不动产 + 善意取得　；参考：《上海社会科学院》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：善意取得制度是结合日耳曼法中的“以手护手”原则与罗马法中的取得时效制度而产生的一项重要的物权法制度。善意取得制度构建的价值目标,是通过调整原权利人与善意受让人对某物的物权归属问题,打破传统的社会交易理念,将善意受让人确定为某物的物权人,旨在增加交易的稳定性,建立一种高效率的交易秩序。传统善意取得制度的适用的客体是动产不包括不动产。然而,传统善意取得制度适用范围的狭窄性,导致不动产交易中常常面临交易不稳定、效率低、不安全的局面。为了有效解决这一问题,不动产善意取得制度应运而生。不动产善意取得制度建立于不动产登记制度之上,是物权公示公信原则的重要体现。由于动产与不动产两者的特征各不相同,因而在不动产善意取得制度的适用上,也难以生搬硬套地直接适用传统的动产善意取得制度,不动产善意取得制度无疑需要在传统善意取得理论上有所创新,以适应动产与不动产两物之间在适用善意取得制度中的不协调。不动产的不可移动性,是区分不动产与动产的显著特征。在不动产善意取得制度的适用上,应该根据不动产本身的特殊性将公示公信原则适用于该制度当中,以实现维护交易完全,实现物之最高效用的目标。同时,不动产本身的特殊性也造成了不动产善意取得制度与动产善意取得制度在构成要件方面的差别,更深入地研究其构成要件的理论问题,同时参考域外先进的立法经验,将重大过失排除与善意取得的范围之外。在司法实践中,冒名处分与共同共有财产的都不符合不动产善意取得的构成要件,不应该适用善意取得以保护第三人的利益。同时,在登记错误的场合下,应该根据登记错误的原因进行处理,并完善相关的配套设施以保障原权利人的权益。
[Abstract]:The system of bona fide acquisition is an important system of real right law which combines the principle of "protecting hands with hands" in Germanic law and the prescription system of acquisition in Roman law. The value goal of bona fide acquisition system is to change the ownership of property right between the original owner and the bona fide transferee, to break the traditional social transaction concept, and to determine the bona fide transferee as the real right person of something. The aim is to increase the stability of transactions and to establish an efficient trading order. The object of the traditional bona fide acquisition system is that movable property does not include immovable property. However, the narrow scope of application of the traditional bona fide acquisition system leads to unstable, inefficient and unsafe transactions in real estate transactions. In order to solve this problem effectively, the system of bona fide acquisition of real estate came into being. The system of acquisition of real estate in good faith is based on the registration system of real estate, which is an important embodiment of the principle of publicizing public trust of real right. Because the characteristics of movable property and immovable property are different, it is difficult to apply the traditional system of bona fide acquisition of movable property to the application of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. There is no doubt that the system of bona fide acquisition of immovable property needs to be innovated in the traditional theory of bona fide acquisition in order to adapt to the incoordination between movable property and immovable property in the application of bona fide acquisition system. Immobility of immovable property is the distinguishing feature between immovable property and movable property. In the application of bona fide acquisition of immovable property, the principle of publicity and public credit should be applied to the system according to the particularity of the immovable property itself, in order to achieve the goal of maintaining the transaction completely and realizing the highest utility of the thing. At the same time, the particularity of the immovable property itself also causes the difference between the bona fide acquisition system of immovable property and the bona fide acquisition system of movable property in terms of the constitutive elements. Exclude gross negligence from the scope of bona fide acquisition. In judicial practice, the disposition of impersonation and common property do not accord with the constitutive requirements of bona fide acquisition of immovable property, and the bona fide acquisition should not be applied to protect the interests of the third party. At the same time, in the case of wrong registration, we should deal with the causes of registration errors, and improve the relevant supporting facilities to protect the rights and interests of the original right holders.
【学位授予单位】：上海社会科学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【共引文献】