专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度存废论

发布时间：2018-07-10 09:52

本文选题：专利侵权 + 补偿性赔偿　；参考：《重庆大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：21世纪是知识经济时代,知识产权发挥着越发重要的作用。专利作为知识产权的重要组成部分,在促进科技创新和知识进步方面具有举足轻重的地位。自2012年8月国家知识产权局第一次公布《中华人民共和国专利法修改草案(征求意见稿)》,其间经过多次研究修改,到2015年4月发布的最新版征求意见稿时间过去已近三年,对于此次修法的主要内容各界仍然争论不休。作为本次专利法修改的热点,围绕专利侵权中引入惩罚性赔偿制度的讨论也异常激烈。无疑鼓励创新、加强侵权保护是专利法修改的一大趋势,然而加强保护是否有必要引入惩罚性赔偿制度,引入惩罚性赔偿能否达到加强保护的实际效果,并未有定论。通过比较国内外发达国家和地区的立法经验,从法学理论和司法适用等多角度进行辩证剖析,结合我国当前的法律体系和司法制度,对惩罚性赔偿引入我国专利法进行否认,指出惩罚性赔偿不适宜引入当前专利法中。本文正文除引言和结语,共分为四个部分:第一部分是惩罚性赔偿的概述,通过介绍惩罚性赔偿的基本定义和主要功能,奠定研究的理论基础。惩罚性赔偿是英美法系特有的法律制度,强调对侵权人的惩罚,遏制侵权行为的再次发生,与大陆法系补偿性赔偿原则截然不同。第二部分是域外专利侵权惩罚性赔偿的比较研究,主要通过对美国和我国台湾地区的专利惩罚性赔偿的论述和经验借鉴,证明在我国现有专利制度和司法审判体系下,不适宜在专利法中引入惩罚性赔偿。两百多年来,即使在作为惩罚性赔偿发源地的英美法系国家,也一直存在众多分歧和争议。第三部分是从法学理论、司法实践、利益平衡等多角度分析,引入惩罚性赔偿会引起法理上的困惑、造成司法适用上的困境、引发滥诉、导致利益的失衡,因此,此次专利法修改不应当引入惩罚性赔偿制度。第四部分是我国现行的专利侵权损害赔偿制度基本理论的分析,明确我国专利侵权应坚持适用补偿性赔偿原则。在此基础上,对专利侵权损害赔偿的计算方法进行阐述并提出一些改进的建议,以促进以补偿性赔偿为原则的现有专利侵权损害赔偿体系更加完善。
[Abstract]:The 21st century is the era of knowledge economy, intellectual property rights play an increasingly important role. As an important part of intellectual property, patent plays an important role in promoting scientific and technological innovation and knowledge progress. Since August 2012, when the State intellectual property Office published for the first time the revised draft of the Patent Law of the people's Republic of China (draft for solicitation of opinions), it has been nearly three years since the latest edition of the revised draft of the Patent Law of the people's Republic of China was published in April 2015 after many studies and revisions. The main content of the revision of the law is still controversial. As the focus of the patent law amendment, the discussion about the introduction of punitive damages in patent infringement is also extremely fierce. There is no doubt that encouraging innovation and strengthening the protection of infringement is a major trend of patent law revision. However, whether it is necessary to introduce punitive damages and whether punitive damages can achieve the actual effect of strengthening protection is not conclusive. By comparing the legislative experience of developed countries and regions at home and abroad, and analyzing dialectically from the angles of law theory and judicial application, and combining the current legal system and judicial system of our country, the author denies the introduction of punitive damages into the patent law of our country. It is pointed out that punitive damages are not suitable to be introduced into current patent law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of punitive damages, through the introduction of the basic definition and main functions of punitive damages, lay a theoretical foundation for the study. Punitive damages is a special legal system in Anglo-American law system. It is different from the principle of compensatory compensation in continental law system to emphasize the punishment of infringers and curb the recurrence of infringement. The second part is the comparative study of punitive damages for foreign patent infringement, mainly through the discussion and experience of the United States and Taiwan area of patent punitive damages, prove that under the existing patent system and judicial system of our country, It is not appropriate to introduce punitive damages into patent law. For more than two hundred years, even as the birthplace of punitive damages in Anglo-American legal system countries, there have been many differences and disputes. The third part is from the legal theory, the judicial practice, the benefit balance and so on multi-angle analysis, the introduction punitive damages will cause the legal principle confusion, causes the judicial application difficult position, causes the excessive lawsuit, causes the benefit unbalance, therefore, The patent law amendment should not introduce punitive damages system. The fourth part is the analysis of the basic theory of the current patent infringement compensation system in China, which makes it clear that the principle of compensatory compensation should be applied in patent infringement in China. On this basis, the calculation method of patent infringement damages is expounded and some suggestions are put forward to promote the improvement of the existing patent infringement compensation system based on compensatory compensation.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】