体育赛事节目的性质及保护方法

发布时间：2018-07-12 08:59

本文选题：体育赛事节目 + 著作权　；参考：《知识产权》2015年11期

【摘要】：分析我国各地法院判决的涉体育赛事节目侵权案件,可以发现案件当事人、法官对体育赛事节目的性质及保护方法方面存在着不同观点。成文法的滞后性与经济发展模式创新性之间的紧张关系,是导致观点分歧的根本原因。体育产业作为我国国民经济新的快速增长点和盗播网络直播节目行为的频发所带来的危害,要求我国著作权法赋予体育赛事节目的权利人控制网络直播行为的专有权利。由于立法具有缓慢性,可通过最高人民法院制定司法解释或指导案例的方式,将具有独创性的体育赛事节目认定为视听作品,或者扩张录像制作者权的保护范围,从而使体育赛事节目权利人有权控制网络实时转播行为。在最高人民法院出台司法解释或指导案例之前,各地法院可按照著作权法解释的规则,妥当裁判涉体育赛事节目侵权案件。
[Abstract]:By analyzing the infringement cases of sports events decided by the courts in various parts of our country, we can find that the litigants and the judges have different views on the nature and protection methods of sports events. The tension between the lag of statutory law and the innovation of economic development model is the root cause of the divergence of views. The sports industry, as a new rapid growth point of national economy in our country and the harm brought by the frequent occurrence of the act of stealing live broadcast on the network, requires that the copyright law of our country grant the exclusive right to control the online direct broadcast of sports events programs. Due to the slowness of the legislation, the Supreme people's Court can formulate judicial interpretations or guide cases, identify original sports events as audio-visual works, or expand the scope of protection of the rights of video producers. As a result, the rights holders of sports events program have the right to control the real-time transmission of the network. Before the Supreme people's Court issues judicial interpretations or guides cases, local courts may, in accordance with the rules of copyright law, properly adjudicate cases involving infringement of sports programs.
【作者单位】：深圳大学法学院;广东省深圳市中级人民法院知识产权庭;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金重大项目《互联网领域知识产权重大立法问题研究》(批准号:14ZDC020)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】