盗赃物的善意取得制度研究
发布时间:2018-07-25 12:12
【摘要】:在民法中有一项历史悠久的制度,它就是善意取得制度。无论是大陆法系还是英美法系,在近代的民法中善意取得制度都有着具足轻重的地位。在保证交易活动中的安全系数和保护善意第三人权益的要求下,善意取得制度更是有其特殊的存在意义,在它的作用下,商品得到了更充分的流通,社会物质财富也得到了飞速地增长。而在其中,尤为特别的就是盗赃物的善意取得问题,它与市场交易的正常运行密不可分。考虑到盗赃物的本身属性和法律属性,维护交易安全、平衡经济运行、保证公平原则势在必行,因此应将研究盗赃物是否适用善意取得这一问题提上日程。在我国司法实践的大环境下,借鉴关于该问题的各国的立法例,本文试图从不同角度进行考察,对盗赃物适用善意取得制度做出一些立法设想。本文分为六大部分。第一部分为绪论,介绍了该课题的研究背景、研究目的、研究意义、研究内容方法以及国内外的研究现状;第二部分介绍了盗赃物善意取得的基本理论,主要是有关盗赃物的基本概念和特征、分类等问题,其中对盗赃物的概念和作出了不同角度的界定,也对盗赃物的不同分类进行了阐述,另外也阐明了盗赃物在我国的追赃意义;第三部分分析了盗赃物适用善意取得制度的必要性和可行性,详细、深入地分析论证了盗赃物能够适用善意取得制度的理由以及其合理的缘由;第四部分介绍了各国的不同立法例,这些立法例都主要是针对关于盗赃物善意取得问题的立法,有否定、肯定、折中三种模式。同时,在考察不同立法例后分别作出了详细分析;第五部分介绍了我国关于盗赃物善意取得的现行制度并指出了在这些制度中发现的一些问题。其中主要是将我国盗赃物善意取得的法律文件按照颁布时间进行排列和梳理,在此基础上,将其存在的问题论述出来。最后一部分介绍了针对我国关于盗赃物是否适用善意取得作出的立法选择。首先,结合我国不同学者的学说表明现阶段能够选择的方向;其次,对建议盗赃物有条件适用善意取得这一选择做出理论分析,表明本文的态度;此外,还与上文论述的问题一一对应,给出解决方案;最后将回复请求权这一概念引入,详细论述回复请求权的适用范围及盗赃物有条件适用善意取得时应类型化区分。希望这些个人分析能够对我国盗赃物善意取得制度的进一步完善尽一份微薄之力。
[Abstract]:There is a long history in the civil law, it is the system of acquisition in good faith. In modern civil law, the system of acquisition in good faith plays a very important role, both in the civil law system and in the common law system. Under the requirements of ensuring the safety factor in trading activities and protecting the rights and interests of bona fide third parties, the system of bona fide acquisition has its special significance. Under its role, goods have been more fully circulated. Social material wealth has also been rapidly growing. Among them, the problem of stolen goods acquisition in good faith is particularly special, which is closely related to the normal operation of market transactions. Considering the property and legal attribute of stolen goods, it is imperative to maintain the transaction security, balance economic operation and guarantee the principle of fairness. Therefore, it should be put on the agenda to study whether the stolen goods can be obtained in good faith. In the general environment of judicial practice in our country, this paper tries to make some legislative assumptions on the application of bona fide acquisition system to stolen property from different angles. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, introduces the research background, research purpose, research significance, research content methods and domestic and foreign research status, the second part introduces the basic theory of stolen goods in good faith. It is mainly related to the basic concept and characteristics of stolen goods, classification and other issues, in which the concept of stolen goods and make different angles of definition, but also the different classification of stolen goods are expounded. The third part analyzes the necessity and feasibility of using bona fide acquisition system to steal stolen goods. The reasons why stolen goods can be applied to bona fide acquisition system and its reasonable reasons are analyzed in depth. The fourth part introduces the different legislations of various countries, which are mainly aimed at the legislation on bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. There are three modes of negation, affirmation and compromise. At the same time, the author makes a detailed analysis after reviewing different legislation cases. The fifth part introduces the current system of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in China and points out some problems found in these systems. The main purpose is to arrange and sort out the legal documents obtained in good faith according to the time of promulgation, and on this basis, to discuss the existing problems. The last part introduces the legislative choice on whether to steal stolen goods in good faith. First of all, combined with the different scholars in China to show the direction that can be chosen at this stage; secondly, to make a theoretical analysis of the choice of conditional application of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods, showing the attitude of this paper; Finally, this paper introduces the concept of the right of reply claim, and discusses in detail the scope of application of the right of reply claim and the classification when the stolen goods are used in good faith. It is hoped that these personal analyses will contribute to the further improvement of the bona fide acquisition system of stolen goods in China.
【学位授予单位】:东北林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2
本文编号:2143786
[Abstract]:There is a long history in the civil law, it is the system of acquisition in good faith. In modern civil law, the system of acquisition in good faith plays a very important role, both in the civil law system and in the common law system. Under the requirements of ensuring the safety factor in trading activities and protecting the rights and interests of bona fide third parties, the system of bona fide acquisition has its special significance. Under its role, goods have been more fully circulated. Social material wealth has also been rapidly growing. Among them, the problem of stolen goods acquisition in good faith is particularly special, which is closely related to the normal operation of market transactions. Considering the property and legal attribute of stolen goods, it is imperative to maintain the transaction security, balance economic operation and guarantee the principle of fairness. Therefore, it should be put on the agenda to study whether the stolen goods can be obtained in good faith. In the general environment of judicial practice in our country, this paper tries to make some legislative assumptions on the application of bona fide acquisition system to stolen property from different angles. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, introduces the research background, research purpose, research significance, research content methods and domestic and foreign research status, the second part introduces the basic theory of stolen goods in good faith. It is mainly related to the basic concept and characteristics of stolen goods, classification and other issues, in which the concept of stolen goods and make different angles of definition, but also the different classification of stolen goods are expounded. The third part analyzes the necessity and feasibility of using bona fide acquisition system to steal stolen goods. The reasons why stolen goods can be applied to bona fide acquisition system and its reasonable reasons are analyzed in depth. The fourth part introduces the different legislations of various countries, which are mainly aimed at the legislation on bona fide acquisition of stolen goods. There are three modes of negation, affirmation and compromise. At the same time, the author makes a detailed analysis after reviewing different legislation cases. The fifth part introduces the current system of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods in China and points out some problems found in these systems. The main purpose is to arrange and sort out the legal documents obtained in good faith according to the time of promulgation, and on this basis, to discuss the existing problems. The last part introduces the legislative choice on whether to steal stolen goods in good faith. First of all, combined with the different scholars in China to show the direction that can be chosen at this stage; secondly, to make a theoretical analysis of the choice of conditional application of bona fide acquisition of stolen goods, showing the attitude of this paper; Finally, this paper introduces the concept of the right of reply claim, and discusses in detail the scope of application of the right of reply claim and the classification when the stolen goods are used in good faith. It is hoped that these personal analyses will contribute to the further improvement of the bona fide acquisition system of stolen goods in China.
【学位授予单位】:东北林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 董彪;何延军;;公法对善意取得制度的影响——以赃物为例[J];法学杂志;2008年06期
2 喻文莉;论民法中的善意取得制度[J];法学评论;1999年04期
3 刘叶群;;论我国赃物的善意取得制度[J];法制与社会;2010年33期
4 张志;;论赃物的善意取得[J];企业经济;2009年06期
5 王晓平;;论司法机关在追赃过程中对善意第三人合法权益的保护[J];实事求是;2006年01期
6 申建平;;债权让与无因性之探讨[J];学术交流;2007年07期
7 孙宪忠;物权法基本范畴及主要制度的反思(下)[J];中国法学;1999年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 钟伟杰;赃物善意取得研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
2 杨志春;论盗抢赃物的善意取得及其适用[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
,本文编号:2143786
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2143786.html