网络环境下著作权间接侵权责任研究

发布时间：2018-08-19 21:11

【摘要】：著作权的间接侵权是相对于直接侵权而言的,它是指未直接实施受专有权利控制的行为,如果其行为与他人的直接侵权行为之间存在特定关系,且行为人具有特定的主观过错,也可基于公共政策原因而被法律定为侵权行为。这类行为构成侵权的原因,并非是其直接侵犯了著作权人的专有权利,因此被称为间接侵权。我国对著作权间接侵权行为的研究至今仍停留在表面的层次;著作权间接侵权类型、具体构成及认定标准仍有待廓清;间接侵权与直接侵权之关系仍需我们作深层的探讨;如何在立法和司法实践上反映、把握间接侵权行为更需要我们作进一步的研究。笔者希望通过本文对著作权“间接侵权”这一概念的剖析,对其作出具体和详细的界定,实现“间接侵权”规则的法定化,更好的保护我国的知识产权。本文共分为五个部分:第一部分案例引入。通过对2015年12月份北京海淀区法院公布的“涉及互联网的十大知识产权经典案例”之一:韩寒文学作品著作权纠纷案(又称“韩寒诉百度文库案”)的分析,引出网络环境下著作权间接侵权的核心问题与发展态势。第二部分对网络环境下著作权间接侵权制度进行概念上的剖析。网络环境下的著作权间接侵权是基于行为人的主观上的明知并提供实质性的帮助而产生的责任承担问题,它与传统意义上的替代责任完全不同。笔者在集合主流国家的观点的基础上,总结了著作权间接侵权的三种类型:教唆、引诱、帮助他人实施侵权行为;“直接侵权”的预备行为和扩大侵权后果的行为;许可侵权行为。第三部分分析了网络环境下著作权间接侵权行为的构成。构成要件有以下几个方面:有直接侵权行为的存在或即将发生;间接侵权行为具有违法性;间接侵权的行为与损害事实之间有因果关系;行为人主观方面有过错。对著作权间接侵权构成要件的剖析,使得司法实践中对著作权间接侵权的认定有据可循。第四部分分析网络环境下间接侵权相关案件在司法实践中的重点和难点是主观过错的认定。笔者对行为主体的主观过错从应知和明知、行为主体的注意义务加以确认。以此来对网络环境下著作权间接侵权行为的司法认定提供认定依据。第五部分分析网络环境下间接侵权责任承担与免责问题。笔者认为网络环境下著作权间接侵权主体承担的是不真正的连带责任。根据“通知与删除”规则以及合理使用等条件,间接侵权主体可以在一定程度上免责。最后结语部分笔者浅谈了一些我国在著作权间接侵权立法方面的注意事项。如何以合理的手段调整网络环境下的著作权间接侵权行为,同时兼顾信息产业健康有序发展,既保护著作权的权利,又不妨碍网络环境的正常运行,同时兼顾社会公众的利益,在三者之间达到平衡,这对于研究网络环境下著作权间接侵权制度具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement of copyright is relative to direct infringement. It refers to the act which is not directly controlled by exclusive rights, if there is a specific relationship between the act and the direct infringement of others, and the perpetrator has specific subjective fault. It can also be defined as a tort on public policy grounds. The reason why such acts constitute infringement is not the direct infringement of the exclusive rights of copyright owners, so it is called indirect infringement. The research on the indirect infringement of copyright in our country is still at the superficial level, the types of indirect infringement of copyright, the specific constitution and the standard of identification are still to be clarified, the relationship between indirect infringement and direct infringement still needs to be deeply discussed. How to reflect in legislation and judicial practice, grasp indirect tort more need us to do further research. The author hopes that through the analysis of the concept of "indirect infringement" of copyright in this paper, the author can define it in detail, realize the legalization of the "indirect infringement" rule, and better protect the intellectual property rights of our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part of the case introduction. An analysis of one of the top 10 classic cases of intellectual property rights involving the Internet published by the Beijing Haidian District Court in December 2015: the Han Han Literary works copyright dispute case (also known as Han Han v. Baidu Literary case), Lead to the network environment of indirect copyright infringement of the core issues and development situation. The second part analyzes the concept of indirect copyright infringement system under the network environment. The indirect infringement of copyright in the network environment is based on the subjective knowledge of the perpetrator and the provision of substantive help. It is completely different from the traditional alternative responsibility. On the basis of integrating the views of mainstream countries, the author summarizes three types of indirect copyright infringement: abetting, luring and helping others to carry out the infringement, the preparatory act of "direct infringement" and the act of expanding the consequences of infringement; License infringement. The third part analyzes the constitution of the indirect copyright infringement under the network environment. The constituent elements have the following aspects: the existence or imminent occurrence of the direct tort; the illegality of the indirect tort; the causality between the indirect tort and the damage fact; the subjective fault of the perpetrator. The analysis of the constitution of the indirect infringement of copyright makes it possible to confirm the indirect infringement of copyright in judicial practice. The fourth part analyzes the subjective fault of indirect tort cases in judicial practice. The author confirms the subjective fault of the subject from knowing and knowing, and the duty of care. In order to provide the basis for the judicial recognition of indirect copyright infringement under the network environment. The fifth part analyzes the indirect tort liability and exemption under the network environment. The author thinks that the subject of indirect copyright infringement under the network environment bears unreal joint and several liability. According to the rules of Notification and deletion and reasonable use, indirect torts can be exempted to some extent. Finally, the author discusses some matters needing attention in the legislation of indirect copyright infringement in China. How to adjust the indirect infringement of copyright in the network environment by reasonable means, and how to take into account the healthy and orderly development of the information industry, not only to protect the rights of copyright, but also not to hinder the normal operation of the network environment, and at the same time to take into account the interests of the public. It is of great significance to study the indirect copyright infringement system in the network environment.
【学位授予单位】：山东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】