当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

论追续权制度在我国的具体构建

发布时间:2018-09-06 15:32
【摘要】:集人身权属性与财产权属性于一身的追续权最早起源于法国,并在此后取得了长足发展。追续权是指作者在其作品原件出售后,就出售所得收益享有的利益分享请求权,亦可称之为报酬请求权。追续权制度是在综合考虑法价值所蕴含的公平、正义理念、追续权客体属性等因素的基础上构建的,从而使得艺术作品交易中各方主体的利益关系趋于平衡,并最终促进艺术品市场的发展、繁荣。作为一项综合性权利,追续权本身存在着复杂的性质,这也引起了学术界的广泛争论。此外,关于我国应否引入、如何引入追续权也莫衷一是。正因为如此,我国要引入追续权,就必须对这些问题做出回答。本文在分析追续权历史脉络的基础上,厘清追续权制度产生的前因后果,从而对追续权有一个较为清晰的认识,并在比较法的基础上对世界主要国家的追续权制度进行比较分析,总结其在新时期的发展趋势,汲取其中的成功经验,为最终引入追续权规则打下基础。在追续权的理论基础部分,通过对追续权基本理论的阐述,回应当前存在的关于追续权性质、客体范围等的争议,论证追续权作为一种综合性权利的合理性。关于现阶段我国的实际国情是否支持引入追续权,本文从多个方面做出了回答,借以论证目前我国建立追续权制度的必要性及可行性。不断发展的艺术品市场为追续权的引入提供了社会基础,而且,各种法律制度包括艺术品交易法律制度已经初步形成。这些制度为我国追续权顺利落地实施并发挥应有的制度效果提供了保证。而且追续权的建立,也是我国与其他国家之间加强法律制度对话的重要桥梁,有利于我国法律制度同国际接轨。所以,本文最后一章对追续权构建作了部分设想,从立法模式的选择、主体和客体的范围、权利行使的方式、追续权的保护期限以及追续权的限制等方面提出了相应建议,以资参考。
[Abstract]:The right of succession, which combines the attributes of personal rights and property rights, originated in France and has made great progress since then. The right of continuation refers to the right of the author to claim for the benefit of the proceeds of sale after the original of his work has been sold, which can also be called the right of claim for remuneration. The system of pursuing the right of continuation is constructed on the basis of synthetically considering the value of law, such as fairness, justice idea, object attribute of the right of continuation, and so on, which makes the interests of the parties in the trade of art works tend to balance. And finally promote the development of the art market, prosperity. As a comprehensive right, the right of continuation itself has a complex nature, which has caused extensive debate in academic circles. In addition, there is no agreement on whether China should introduce the right of follow-up. Because of this, our country must answer these questions if we want to introduce the right of pursuing. Based on the analysis of the historical context of the pursuit of the right of succession, this paper clarifies the causes and consequences of the system of pursuing the right of continuation, and thus has a clear understanding of the right to pursue the right of continuation. On the basis of comparative law, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the system of the right of continuation in major countries in the world, summarizes its development trend in the new period, draws on its successful experience, and lays a foundation for the eventual introduction of the rules of the right of continuation. In the part of the theoretical foundation of the right to pursue the continuation, through the elaboration of the basic theory of the right of follow-up, in response to the existing disputes about the nature of the right of pursuit, the scope of the object, and so on, the rationality of the right to pursue continuation as a comprehensive right is demonstrated. As to whether or not the actual situation of our country supports the introduction of the right of follow-up at present, this paper gives some answers from many aspects in order to prove the necessity and feasibility of establishing the system of the right of follow-up in our country at present. The continuous development of art market provides the social basis for the introduction of the right of continuation, and various legal systems, including the legal system of art trading, have been formed. These systems provide the guarantee for the successful implementation of the right of succession in our country and the exertion of the due effect of the system. Moreover, the establishment of the right of continuation is also an important bridge between China and other countries to strengthen the dialogue of legal system, which is conducive to the international integration of our legal system. Therefore, in the last chapter of this paper, some suggestions are put forward from the following aspects: the choice of legislative model, the scope of subject and object, the way of exercising rights, the duration of protection of the right to pursue and the limitation of the right of continuation. For reference.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 宋元婧;权祯珉;;追续权的理论与立法[J];北方法学;2015年04期

2 韩赤风;;德国追续权制度及其借鉴[J];知识产权;2014年09期

3 刘宁;戴蕾;;比较法视域下我国追续权制度的构建[J];电子知识产权;2014年07期

4 [kW 瑞;薄亮;;“追续权”入法的合理性和必要性质疑[J];中国专利与商标;2014年02期

5 李雨峰;;论追续权制度在我国的构建——以《著作权法》第三次修改为中心[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年01期

6 吕继锋;;著作追续权综合权利说的法律思考[J];中国律师;2013年09期

7 王娟;;浅析我国著作权法与伯尔尼公约的区别[J];法制与社会;2011年20期

8 储水江;;论追续权[J];法学杂志;2008年06期

9 丁丽瑛,邹国雄;追续权的理论基础和制度构建[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年03期

10 沈宗灵;;法 正义 利益[J];中外法学;1993年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 张娟;;追续权 看起来很美[N];中国商报;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 姚忻;试论美术作品的追续权[D];西北大学;2003年



本文编号:2226784

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2226784.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户59dd8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com