业主车位(车库)优先使用权研究
[Abstract]:The dispute over the ownership and use of parking spaces is a difficult problem in building separation. Article 74 of our country's Real right Law provides for the ownership and utilization of parking spaces and garages in our country. However, due to the generality of the law and the complexity of real life, there are many problems in the understanding and application of this article. Among them, with regard to the use in article 74, paragraph 1, of "the planning of parking spaces for parking vehicles, the garage shall first meet the needs of the owners", a lack of consistency of understanding and operation has arisen in the application, As a result, the legal parking interests of owners are difficult to be protected in practice, and the contradiction between owners and developers intensifies, which affects the construction of harmonious communities. In order to solve these problems, this paper, on the basis of analyzing the legislative intent and realistic demand of the legal provisions, taking the theory of preemption of real estate as the starting point, fully considers the weak position of the owner in the comparison with the developer. Put forward owner parking space (garage) priority right. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly includes five parts: the first part: the origin of the concept of priority use right of parking space (garage). First of all, since the promulgation of the property Law, scholars have described various interpretations of "meeting the needs of the owner first" in order to sort out the origin of the concept of the priority use right of the owner's parking space (garage); secondly, by comparing the civil priority, The preemptive right of purchase, combined with the legislative intent of Article 74 of the property Law, gives a general definition and analysis of the characteristics of the owner's priority right of use of parking spaces (garages). The second part: the property and effect of the owner's parking space (garage) priority right. On the basis of reviewing the dispute of the nature of the traditional preemption right and combining the legislative purpose, the author defines the property of the owner's priority use right as the substantive right, the qualification right and the forming right. In view of the dispute on the normative nature of Article 74 (1) of the Real Law in reality, this paper comprehensively expounds the effectiveness of this right to the seller, the owner and the third party other than the owner. The third part: the reasonable analysis of the owner parking space (garage) priority right. Based on the principle of building ownership division, this paper analyzes the legal basis of the owner's preferential use right of parking space (garage) from the perspective of the exclusive part and the common part. And then explains the harmonious order pursued by the system and the value goal of protecting the weak. The fourth part: the owner parking space (garage) priority right to obtain conditions and exercise. From the angle of system structure analysis, through the analysis of the owner's qualification, the definition of the owner's "need", the extermination period of the owner's right to exercise, The "specific conditions" of the exercise of rights and other aspects elaborated the owner parking space (garage) priority access to obtain and exercise the connotation of the system. The fifth part: the legislation and practice of the owner parking space (garage) priority right system. From the point of view of perfecting the system, through the comparative analysis of the extraterritorial legislation of the United States, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and other relevant legislative practices in various parts of our country on the use of parking spaces and garages, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the use of parking spaces and garages. On this basis, three enlightenments, such as defining the ownership of parking spaces, perfecting the registration system of parking spaces and perfecting the information disclosure system, are compared and summarized.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖江华;张春红;;论股东优先购买权的几个问题[J];广西轻工业;2006年05期
2 郭海峰;;从效率的角度看优先购买权的几个问题[J];行政与法;2006年10期
3 李志忠;;优先购买权的类型及其适用范围[J];甘肃高师学报;2007年02期
4 马东升;;论优先购买权的性质[J];河南商业高等专科学校学报;2007年04期
5 胡大武;张莹;;有限责任公司股东优先购买权的理论基础[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2007年08期
6 陈进;;论股东优先购买权的部分行使[J];河南商业高等专科学校学报;2009年02期
7 刘晓凤;;浅析股权转让中的股东优先购买权[J];中国商界(下半月);2009年09期
8 李文成;;我是否享有优先购买权[J];生意通;2010年12期
9 李艳宁;;浅谈股东优先购买权法律解释中存在的问题[J];法制与社会;2011年12期
10 司徒洁;;优先购买权之法律属性初探[J];法制与社会;2011年32期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 陈启;;国有股权挂牌出让中股东如何行使优先购买权[A];中华全国律师协会公司法专业委员会2009年年会论文集[C];2009年
2 王玉;;论承租人优先购买权在房屋拍卖中的实现[A];繁荣学术 服务龙江——黑龙江省第二届社会科学学术年会优秀论文集(上册)[C];2010年
3 刘彤海;;论承租人优先购买权的立法缺陷[A];2009中华全国律师协会经济专业委员会年会论文集[C];2009年
4 周勇峰;;股权转让中的几个特殊问题[A];第四届中国律师论坛百篇优秀论文集[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王发强;优先购买权能否延伸至非租赁物[N];中国改革报;2003年
2 郑讨勤;同享优先购买权谁能更“优先”[N];广西政法报;2001年
3 ;房屋共有人和承租人享有同等优先购买权吗[N];法制日报;2003年
4 北京市环球律师事务所合伙人 张_";有限责任公司股东可否部分行使优先购买权?[N];法制日报;2005年
5 熊艳蓓 姚德磊;公有住房出售 原住户有无优先购买权[N];工人日报;2005年
6 黄天昌;哪一种优先权更优先?[N];甘肃日报;2001年
7 刘金林;租赁楼房一部分是否有优先购买权[N];检察日报;2003年
8 ;多个房屋承租人的优先购买权如何实现[N];江苏法制报;2005年
9 李坤复;租赁部分房产人是否享有整栋房屋的优先购买权?[N];江苏法制报;2005年
10 许雪樵 王传玉;整体出售房屋,,部分承租人有优先购买权吗?[N];江苏法制报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 任君萍;优先购买权制度研究[D];云南大学;2010年
2 林杉;论优先购买权的实现[D];山东经济学院;2011年
3 杨善长;优先购买权制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
4 符锡梅;论民事优先购买权制度[D];对外经济贸易大学;2007年
5 李嘉;论优先购买权[D];北京大学;2008年
6 王楠楠;国家文物优先购买权探析[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2013年
7 吴雪凤;论房屋拍卖中优先购买权人法律保护制度[D];华侨大学;2013年
8 胡珊;论有限责任公司股东优先购买权[D];厦门大学;2014年
9 萧地;论股东优先购买权的对抗[D];吉林大学;2014年
10 周洋旭;论有限责任公司股东优先购买权[D];吉林大学;2014年
本文编号:2241227
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2241227.html