网络遗嘱效力研究
[Abstract]:Internet will is a new type of network service that has emerged in recent years. Users can store their personal information in the network storage box and designate other contacts in case the user accidentally dies. The website will transfer the information to the designated contact person under the supervision of the notary authority. This paper systematically arranges the main concept of network will, probes into its legal effect, analyzes the obstacle factors of the validity of network will, and puts forward a preliminary idea for the legalization of network will in the future. Internet wills provide a private space for people to put aside the prejudices and taboos of traditional Chinese culture on wills, and to arrange their property well in advance of accidents. In a healthy state of mind to face the unknown and risks of life. As soon as it appears, people pay close attention to it, and the legal effect of it is controversial in academic circles. This article thinks that the net will does not belong to the law stipulation will form, therefore does not have the legal effect. However, the law does not prohibit the preservation and transmission of user information on the network, so the existence of network will meets the needs of the market and has certain practical significance. In addition, it is difficult to verify the authenticity, the information security risk is high, and the gap in supervision is the main factor that hinders the validity of the Internet will. The form of will can guarantee the legitimacy of the will to a certain extent and help to realize the will of the testator, but it should also take into account the actual needs of social development and maintain the balance between social interests and personal interests. Too much emphasis on the formal integrity of the will may run counter to the testator's true meaning. In order to realize the will of the testator on his deathbed, if there is sufficient evidence to show that the will is indeed the will of the testator, the will shall be considered valid. The validity of the will cannot be denied by mere defects in the form of the will. Internet will, if confirmed by the law, can give full play to the law to promote efficiency. How to ensure the convenience and rapidity of network wills and at the same time to effectively identify its authenticity, as well as the identification of institutions and procedures need strict law to regulate. The existence of Internet will has a unique meaning for examining oneself and caring for loved ones. Although it is invalid in law, it is reasonable in emotion. Although there is still a long way to go from legalization to network will, with the influence of network will continue to expand, this retention of true feelings, the humanistic spirit of transmission of love will continue to carry forward.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任祖荣;论共同遗嘱[J];江苏广播电视大学学报;2005年01期
2 睢素利;单国军;;共同遗嘱的法律效力研析[J];成人高教学刊;2008年04期
3 鲁晓明;;共同遗嘱上的两难抉择及其立法应对[J];广东商学院学报;2008年03期
4 陈小愿;;论遗嘱自由及其限制[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2010年06期
5 吴国平;;夫妻共同遗嘱的效力及其立法建议[J];福建江夏学院学报;2011年02期
6 张淞;;共同遗嘱中的两难抉择及立法探讨[J];现代交际;2012年08期
7 郭彩汾;;论遗嘱自由之限制[J];知识经济;2013年20期
8 曲润富,楼晓;夫妻共同遗嘱不得限制一方的遗嘱自由[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;1994年04期
9 檀钊;;共同遗嘱制度初论──兼论中国共同遗嘱制度的建立与完善[J];创新;2013年06期
10 袁仕友;;我能否变更自己的遗嘱[J];长寿;2006年07期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 夏秀渊;;试论对遗嘱自由的限制[A];第二届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2001年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈立烽 叶文炳;电脑打字遗嘱有效[N];人民法院报;2005年
2 本报通讯员 郭敬波;打印的遗嘱引发法律争议[N];工人日报;2011年
3 梅海洋;共同遗嘱应有限肯定[N];江苏法制报;2012年
4 石景山区法院 董妍;遗嘱自由的底线在哪里[N];北京日报;2013年
5 段春梅 陆俊芳 熊要先 北京市高级人民法院 北京市顺义区人民法院;不符形式要件但系遗嘱人真实意思的遗嘱应有效[N];人民法院报;2013年
6 傅达林;怎样设立遗嘱[N];法制日报;2002年
7 本报记者 李吉斌;公证遗嘱不应具有当然优先效力[N];法制日报;2013年
8 戴娟;对我国遗嘱自由进行适当限制的立法思考[N];江苏法制报;2006年
9 ;遗嘱为证,缘何依然败诉?[N];广东科技报;2003年
10 本报记者 刘娜 实习生 张美橙;难以继承的遗产[N];云南政协报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘琼;论共同遗嘱[D];郑州大学;2010年
2 孙晓曦;论遗嘱自由及其必要限制[D];沈阳工业大学;2012年
3 张文杰;共同遗嘱相关法律问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2013年
4 马玉锦;共同遗嘱制度研究[D];内蒙古大学;2013年
5 张婷;论共同遗嘱及其立法构建[D];中国政法大学;2014年
6 刘颖玲;论夫妻共同遗嘱的效力[D];暨南大学;2015年
7 余灏洋;论遗嘱财产处分的限制[D];宁波大学;2015年
8 宋海艳;共同遗瞩研究[D];黑龙江大学;2015年
9 谢开玫;论夫妻共同遗嘱的法律性质与生效要件[D];暨南大学;2015年
10 葛婉平;网络遗嘱效力研究[D];扬州大学;2015年
,本文编号:2248101
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2248101.html