论著作权转换性使用之非转换性
发布时间：2018-10-22 14:01
【摘要】：转换性使用是美国著作权开放式合理使用模式中的主导性标准,也是我国专家学者衡量新型使用争议的重要理论依据。但转换性使用在内容和目的上均存在解释困境。对于"不同目的"和"新的表达、含义或信息"的界定缺乏客观衡量标准。美国转换性使用的普遍适用是后续法院遵循其最高法院判例的需求所致。转换性使用更多的是法院判决结果合理化的说理帽子,而不是影响判决结果的分析工具。我国不应过于注重对转换性概念本身的界定,应直接衡量使用背后所带来的公共利益、交易障碍及对原著作权人创作激励的市场影响,以达到社会科学文化的最大化发展。
[Abstract]:Transformational use is the dominant standard in the open and rational use of copyright in the United States, and it is also an important theoretical basis for Chinese experts and scholars to measure the new use dispute. However, the transformative use of the content and purpose of the interpretation of the dilemma. The definition of "different purpose" and "new expression, meaning or information" lacks objective measure. The universal application of transformational use in the United States is the result of the need for subsequent courts to follow their Supreme Court jurisprudence. The transformative use is more the reasoning hat of the court judgment result rationalization than the analysis tool which affects the judgment result. Our country should not pay too much attention to the definition of the concept of conversion, but should directly measure the public interests, trade barriers and the market impact on the original copyright owners' creation incentives brought by the use of the original copyright, so as to maximize the development of social science culture.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“大数据时代个人信息保护的‘场景风险监管’模式研究”(17CFX069)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2287348
[Abstract]:Transformational use is the dominant standard in the open and rational use of copyright in the United States, and it is also an important theoretical basis for Chinese experts and scholars to measure the new use dispute. However, the transformative use of the content and purpose of the interpretation of the dilemma. The definition of "different purpose" and "new expression, meaning or information" lacks objective measure. The universal application of transformational use in the United States is the result of the need for subsequent courts to follow their Supreme Court jurisprudence. The transformative use is more the reasoning hat of the court judgment result rationalization than the analysis tool which affects the judgment result. Our country should not pay too much attention to the definition of the concept of conversion, but should directly measure the public interests, trade barriers and the market impact on the original copyright owners' creation incentives brought by the use of the original copyright, so as to maximize the development of social science culture.
【作者单位】： 中山大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“大数据时代个人信息保护的‘场景风险监管’模式研究”(17CFX069)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41
【相似文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 钟山;美国版权法中的转换性使用研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
2 邢颖琪;作品转换性使用问题研究[D];郑州大学;2016年
，本文编号：2287348
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2287348.html
