浅析王泽鉴的请求权基础理论的若干问题

发布时间：2018-11-27 20:36

【摘要】：请求权基础思维属于大陆法系国家,随着台湾地区学者王泽鉴将请求权基础理论引进大陆,以及大陆众多学者对民法学说判例研究的认可,请求权基础思维便在中国的民事法律思维的培养和训练中奠定了夯实的法律地位。本文从请求权的概念,请求权基础的概念,请求权方法的概念为起点,对王泽鉴请求权基本理论作梳理,并提出本文对这三个概念所下的定义和理解。毕竟,法律概念是一切法律理论研究的起点,必须以谨慎和严肃的态度对待,才能有后续理论研究的发展。同时,本文主张,概念的内容应该随着社会的发展,人类的进步而不断发展,扩充和完善。紧接着,本文对王泽鉴的请求权基础的类型和请求权竞合作出论述,与王泽鉴所提出类型化思考的重要性相契合。与此同时,笔者在学习王泽鉴的请求权基本理论后,在其影响下,所形成的自己独特的请求权基本理论的思维的概述。最后,本文阐述了王泽鉴的请求权基础的功能和意义,以期望对案件事实及价值的判断,个案正当的公平的裁判有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The basic thinking of the right of claim belongs to the countries of the civil law system. With the introduction of the basic theory of the right of claim into the mainland by Wang Zejian, a scholar from Taiwan, and the recognition of the case studies of civil law doctrine by many scholars in the mainland, The basic thinking of right of claim has laid a solid legal position in the training and training of civil legal thinking in China. Starting with the concept of the right of claim, the concept of the basis of the right of claim and the concept of the method of the right of claim, this paper combs the basic theory of Wang Zejian's right of claim, and puts forward the definition and understanding of these three concepts in this paper. After all, the concept of law is the starting point of all the theoretical studies of law. At the same time, this paper argues that the content of the concept should be developed, expanded and perfected with the development of society and the progress of human beings. Then, this paper discusses the types of the basis of Wang Zejian's right of claim and the concurrence of the right of claim, which coincides with the importance of the typological thinking proposed by Wang Zejian. At the same time, after studying Wang Zejian's basic theory of right of claim, under its influence, the author forms an overview of his own unique basic theory of claim. Finally, this paper expounds the function and significance of Wang Ze-jian 's right of claim basis, in order to expect to judge the facts and value of the case and the fair and just judgment of the case.
【作者单位】：云南民族大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】