论物权合同的独立性——以《物权法》第十五条的解释为中心
发布时间：2018-12-08 12:24
【摘要】：物权公示原则应存在例外,登记与否本身并不必然决定物权的有无,不动产登记的目的并非设权,而在于确保稳定有序的物权交易秩序。然而,《物权法》上的善意取得制度足以维护动态物权流转秩序,保障交易安全。基于此,《物权法》第十五条规定的"合同"不宜简单地限定为债权合同,而应在解除物权效力与登记绑定的基础上,承认物权合同的独立性并确认其物权效力,基于法律行为的不动产物权归属应根据有效的物权合同判定。是故,不动产登记权利人并不能当然地对抗已经占有不动产的前买受人。
[Abstract]:There should be exceptions to the principle of real right publicity. Registration itself does not necessarily determine the existence or absence of real right. The purpose of real estate registration is not to establish rights, but to ensure a stable and orderly order of real right transactions. However, the bona fide acquisition system in the Real right Law is sufficient to maintain the order of the circulation of dynamic real right and ensure the transaction security. On the basis of this, the "contract" stipulated in Article 15 of the "Real Law" should not simply be limited to the contract of creditor's rights, but should recognize the independence of the contract of real right and confirm its effect of real right on the basis of releasing the validity of real right from binding with registration. Real property ownership based on legal act should be judged according to valid real right contract. Therefore, the owner of real estate registration right can not naturally confront the former buyer who has already possessed the real estate.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学;
【分类号】：D923.2
[Abstract]:There should be exceptions to the principle of real right publicity. Registration itself does not necessarily determine the existence or absence of real right. The purpose of real estate registration is not to establish rights, but to ensure a stable and orderly order of real right transactions. However, the bona fide acquisition system in the Real right Law is sufficient to maintain the order of the circulation of dynamic real right and ensure the transaction security. On the basis of this, the "contract" stipulated in Article 15 of the "Real Law" should not simply be limited to the contract of creditor's rights, but should recognize the independence of the contract of real right and confirm its effect of real right on the basis of releasing the validity of real right from binding with registration. Real property ownership based on legal act should be judged according to valid real right contract. Therefore, the owner of real estate registration right can not naturally confront the former buyer who has already possessed the real estate.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学;
【分类号】：D923.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 葛云松;;物权行为:传说中的不死鸟——《物权法》上的物权变动模式研究[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年06期
2 孙宪忠,常鹏翱;论法律物权和事实物权的区分[J];法学研究;2001年05期
3 王利明;;论他物权的设定[J];法学研究;2005年06期
4 杨明宇;;《物权法》第15条的涵义与负担行为、处分行为的区分——兼评最高人民法院买卖合同司法解释第3条[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年09期
5 梁慧星;;我国民法是否承认物权行为[J];法学研究;1989年06期
6 姜茂坤;;论民国初期(1912～1921年)物权契约的适用进路转换与理论发展[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2008年04期
7 孙宪忠;再谈物权行为理论[J];中国社会科学;2001年05期
8 毛玮;;论物权合同的契据性[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
9 马强;;借名购房案件所涉问题之研究——以法院裁判的案件为中心[J];政治与法律;2014年07期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹海雷,王坚R，
本文编号：2368341
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2368341.html
