交付原则框架下的意思自治

发布时间：2019-07-21 13:41

【摘要】：虽然我国《物权法》第23条坚持交付原则,但否认存在"约定例外"的可能性。对这一立法变化的效力不宜按照"新法优于旧法"进行解读,因为物权法定原则与动产所有权变动并无直接关联,意思自治也不会危及交易安全。鉴于我国《物权法》第25~27条规定的观念交付方式已经隐藏了意思自治的空间,即使允许默示占有改定,也不会导致对合意原则的替代。由于交付原则只是发挥默示规则的作用,《物权法》第23条仅具有任意性规范的性质。当事人可以约定不同于交付时点的所有权移转时间,甚至可以完全脱离对转让动产的占有。交付原则通过允许观念交付拓展意思自治空间,合意原则针对非特定物要求特定化,两者的差异已经显著缩小。
[Abstract]:Although Article 23 of the property Law of our country adheres to the principle of delivery, it denies the possibility of "agreed exception". The effect of this legislative change should not be interpreted according to the "new law is superior to the old law", because the legal principle of real right is not directly related to the change of chattel ownership, and autonomy of will not endanger the transaction security. In view of the fact that the concept delivery mode stipulated in articles 25 ~ 27 of the property Law of our country has hidden the space of autonomy of will, even if implied possession is allowed to be changed, it will not lead to the substitution of the principle of agreement. Because the principle of delivery only acts as an implied rule, Article 23 of the property Law only has the nature of arbitrariness. The parties may agree on the transfer time of ownership different from the time of delivery, or even completely break away from the possession of the transferred movable property. The principle of delivery expands the space of autonomy by allowing concept delivery, and the principle of agreement is specific to the requirements of non-specific objects, and the difference between the two has been significantly narrowed.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学“十二五”规划2014年课题“占有移转与动产所有权变动”(项目号:2014EFX002) 上海交通大学新进青年教师启动计划“以占有变动为中心的动产物权变动”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】