认真对待民法总则中的公共利益
发布时间：2019-07-24 20:06
【摘要】：公共利益,是得以限制民事主体自由的足够充分且正当的理由,属于民法的核心范畴之一。我国既有的民事法律传统,认可公共利益的存在,而且认可公共利益得区分为社会公共利益与国家利益,《中华人民共和国民法总则》秉承了这一民事法律传统。遵循民法价值判断问题的实体性论证规则,主张在特定情形下存在公共利益的讨论者,应承担相应的论证责任。可以行使国家公权力对公共利益进行类型化的机关,应当慎重行使该项权力,不得动辄以维护公共利益为由,限制或者否定民事主体的自由。
[Abstract]:Public interest is a sufficient and legitimate reason to limit the freedom of civil subject, which belongs to one of the core categories of civil law. The existing civil legal tradition of our country recognizes the existence of public interest, and the recognition of public interest can be divided into social public interest and national interest. The General provisions of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China adheres to this civil legal tradition. Following the substantive argumentation rules of the value judgment of civil law, the discussants who have public interests under specific circumstances should bear the corresponding argumentation responsibility. Organs that can exercise state public power to type the public interest shall exercise this power cautiously and shall not restrict or negate the freedom of the civil subject on the ground of safeguarding the public interest.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心;中国青年政治学院法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“民法典编纂重大疑难问题研究”(14ZDC017)成果
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2518839
[Abstract]:Public interest is a sufficient and legitimate reason to limit the freedom of civil subject, which belongs to one of the core categories of civil law. The existing civil legal tradition of our country recognizes the existence of public interest, and the recognition of public interest can be divided into social public interest and national interest. The General provisions of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China adheres to this civil legal tradition. Following the substantive argumentation rules of the value judgment of civil law, the discussants who have public interests under specific circumstances should bear the corresponding argumentation responsibility. Organs that can exercise state public power to type the public interest shall exercise this power cautiously and shall not restrict or negate the freedom of the civil subject on the ground of safeguarding the public interest.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心;中国青年政治学院法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“民法典编纂重大疑难问题研究”(14ZDC017)成果
【分类号】：D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 杜娟娟;;浅析知识产权法与公共利益[J];职业圈;2007年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 丁延龄;社会公共利益的法理学探析[D];南京师范大学;2006年
，本文编号：2518839
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2518839.html
