琼瑶诉于正案之评析
发布时间：2019-07-31 12:48
【摘要】：琼瑶诉于正案争议焦点主要集中于三个方面:一是被告是否构成侵权;二是判赔数额是否合理;三是是否应该判处被告停止侵权。是否构成实质性相似是判断构成著作权侵权的标准,不仅要使情节脱离整体结构进行比较,而且要从宏观和微观进行综合比较。本案在基于侵权者非法所得的条件下,判赔金额偏少。对于既是侵权作品,又具有独创性的演绎作品来说,判处"禁播"的处罚过重。
[Abstract]:Qiongyao's complaint is mainly focused on three aspects:first, whether the defendant constitutes an infringement;Second, whether the amount of claim is reasonable;The third is whether the defendant should be sentenced to stop the infringement. Whether or not to constitute the substantive similarity is the criterion of determining the infringement of copyright, not only to make the plot separate from the overall structure for comparison, but also from macroscopic and micro comparison. In this case, under the condition of illegal income from the infringer, the amount of claim is less. For both infringing and original work, the punishment of``No Broadcast'' is too heavy.
【作者单位】： 江苏师范大学;
【分类号】：D923.41
，
本文编号：2521334
[Abstract]:Qiongyao's complaint is mainly focused on three aspects:first, whether the defendant constitutes an infringement;Second, whether the amount of claim is reasonable;The third is whether the defendant should be sentenced to stop the infringement. Whether or not to constitute the substantive similarity is the criterion of determining the infringement of copyright, not only to make the plot separate from the overall structure for comparison, but also from macroscopic and micro comparison. In this case, under the condition of illegal income from the infringer, the amount of claim is less. For both infringing and original work, the punishment of``No Broadcast'' is too heavy.
【作者单位】： 江苏师范大学;
【分类号】：D923.41
，
本文编号：2521334
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2521334.html
