股东实体权利的司法救济

发布时间：2018-02-05 00:24

本文关键词： 股东实体权利派生诉讼司法救济直接诉讼　出处：《湘潭大学》2003年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 我国于1993年12月19日颁布了《中华人民共和国公司法》，，其中规定了股东的各项实体权利。要使股东的实体权利落到实处，就要规定相应的救济措施，即当股东的实体权利受到来自诸如大股东、董事会等的侵害时，股东可以通过私力或公力救济手段来保护自己的合法权益。司法救济是指股东通过诉讼的手段保护自己合法权益的救济方式。在各种救济手段中，司法救济是最后的、也应当是最有效力的救济方式。股东诉讼的方式有两种，一是股东直接诉讼，二是股东派生诉讼。我国公司法第111条规定了股东直接诉讼，但该条规定的适用范围和可操作性不尽如人意。至于股东派生诉讼，我国公司法没有规定。可见，在股东实体权利的司法救济方面，我国公司法的规定是很不完善的。在国外，无论大陆法系还是英美法系，都把股东诉讼作为保障股东合法权益的重要手段。论文对股东权的内容和性质、股东直接诉讼和股东派生诉讼的法理作了分析，利用现有资料对各国和地区如英国、美国、法国、韩国、日本和我国台湾地区的股东直接诉讼和股东派生诉讼作了比较研究，并分析了我国股东诉讼的立法和司法现状，然后对完善我国的股东直接诉讼制度和建立我国的股东派生诉讼制度提出自己的建议。最后，基于我国国有股股东权的特殊情况，论文还对国有资产监督管理委员会在利用股东诉讼保护国有股东的实体权利方面应起的作用进行了讨论。
[Abstract]:In December 19th 1993, China promulgated the Company Law of the people's Republic of China, which stipulates the substantive rights of shareholders. It is necessary to provide corresponding relief measures, that is, when the substantive rights of shareholders are infringed by such as large shareholders, board of directors, etc. Shareholders can protect their legitimate rights and interests through private or public remedies. Judicial relief means shareholders through litigation means to protect their legitimate rights and interests relief. In all kinds of relief means. Judicial remedy is the last, and should be the most effective remedy. There are two ways of shareholder litigation, one is shareholder direct action. The second is shareholder derivative action. Article 111 of our company law provides for direct action by shareholders, but the scope of application and maneuverability of this provision is not satisfactory. As for shareholder derivative action. There are no provisions in our company law. It can be seen that in the aspect of the judicial relief of the substantive rights of shareholders, the provisions of our company law are very imperfect. In foreign countries, no matter the civil law system or the common law system. The paper analyzes the content and nature of shareholder's right, the legal principle of shareholder's direct action and shareholder's derivative action. This paper makes a comparative study of shareholder direct litigation and shareholder derivative litigation in various countries and regions such as the United Kingdom, the United States, France, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. And analyzes the legislative and judicial status of shareholder litigation in China, and then to improve our shareholders direct litigation system and establish our shareholder derivative litigation system put forward their own suggestions. Based on the special situation of shareholders' rights of state-owned shares in China, the paper also discusses the role that the State-owned assets Supervision and Administration Commission should play in protecting the substantive rights of state-owned shareholders by using shareholder litigation.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2003
【分类号】：D922.29

【参考文献】