造船合同的法律规制问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-23 01:53

本文关键词： 造船合同英国货物销售法 SAJ 海商法所有权转移　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：自改革开放以来,我国造船业不断发展,近年来更是呈现出了欣欣向荣的发展态势,不仅逐渐成长为造船大国,在造船市场中也越来越多地扮演着船东的角色。而恰恰是我国造船合同买卖双方的并行发展,使得我国的相关法律规制不能过分地保护一方利益,也就不能简单地效仿国际上通行的造船合同规则。同时,由于我国《海商法》等法律规范关于造船合同规定的缺失,所以本文意在作出一些相关的探讨。首先,笔者对造船合同的性质进行了探讨,简单介绍了国际上存在的三种观点,即买卖合同性质派、承揽合同性质派和混合派,随后针对我国理论界和实践界的混乱现状,从而提出了笔者自己的观点:合同的性质应取决于建船主要材料的提供者,若由买方提供,则应认定为承揽合同,反之则应为买卖合同。其次,笔者通过详细分析造船市场经常采用的,日本造船业协会制定的SAJ标准文本以及英国《1979年货物销售法》,希望其中具有借鉴意义的内容为我国《海商法》所吸收。对于英国79年法,笔者主要就货物质量的默示条款、货物所有权的转移、风险转移、货物的检验接受与拒绝,四个方面的内容加以分析,并通过相应判例进行适当地补充。对于SAJ标准文本,笔者主要从交船与所有权转移、违约与救济、船价及其调整、试航、担保责任,这五个方面进行了详尽地分析。再次,笔者分别对现行《合同法》和《海商法》关于造船合同的相关规定,以及中国海商法协会新近提出的标准造船合同文本进行了全面分析,指出了这些法律规制在船舶所有权转移、质量担保等方面存在的漏洞。最后,笔者提出了对于《海商法》的一些立法建议,认为应当将“造船合同”设立专章,其内容包括:造船合同的性质、船舶所有权及其转移、设计风险、船舶抵押权、船价及其变更、试航、质量担保、交船、违约与救济。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the shipbuilding industry of our country has been developing continuously. In recent years, the shipbuilding industry has taken on a thriving development trend, not only has it gradually grown into a shipbuilding country, In the shipbuilding market more and more plays the role of shipowners, and it is precisely because of the concurrent development of both parties of shipbuilding contracts in China, the relevant legal regulations in our country can not excessively protect the interests of one side. At the same time, due to the lack of shipbuilding contract provisions in China's Maritime Law and other legal norms, this paper intends to make some relevant discussions. First of all, the author discusses the nature of shipbuilding contract, and briefly introduces three international viewpoints, namely, the nature of the sale contract, the nature of the contract and the mixed school, and then aims at the chaotic situation of the theoretical and practical circles in our country. The author puts forward his own opinion that the nature of the contract should depend on the supplier of the main materials for the construction of the ship, if provided by the buyer, it should be regarded as the contract of contract of contract, otherwise it should be the contract of purchase and sale. Secondly, the author through the detailed analysis of shipbuilding market often used, The text of SAJ standard made by Japan Shipbuilding Association and the British Law on the Sale of goods of 1979 hope that the contents of which can be used for reference will be absorbed by the Maritime Law of our country. For the 79 years Law of England, the author mainly deals with the implied clauses on the quality of goods. The transfer of the ownership of goods, the transfer of risks, the acceptance and rejection of the inspection of the goods, the analysis of the contents of four aspects, and the appropriate supplement through the corresponding cases. For the text of the SAJ standard, the author mainly from the ship delivery and the transfer of ownership, Breach of contract and relief, ship price and its adjustment, trial shipping, warranty liability, these five aspects are analyzed in detail. Thirdly, the author makes a comprehensive analysis of the relevant provisions on shipbuilding contracts in the current contract Law of contract and Maritime Law, as well as the new text of the Standard Shipbuilding contract proposed by the China Maritime Law Association. The loopholes of these legal regulations in ship ownership transfer and quality guarantee are pointed out. Finally, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions for the Maritime Law, and holds that the shipbuilding contract should be set up a special chapter, which includes: the nature of the shipbuilding contract, the ownership of the ship and its transfer, the risk of design, the mortgage of the ship. Price and change, trial, quality guarantee, delivery, breach of contract and remedy.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.6;F426.474

【引证文献】