有限责任公司股东资格的司法确认研究

发布时间：2018-02-27 08:38

本文关键词： 有限责任公司股东资格司法确认证据　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近几年,随着有限责任公司股东资格确认纠纷案件的不断增多,如何合理解决股东资格的具体确认己成了当前理论界和实务界日益关注的问题。由于现行公司立法缺乏对股东资格的明确界定,最高人民法院也没有出台有关股东资格确认依据的司法解释,导致在司法实践中,各地法院各自为判、裁判依据极不统一的现象大量存在,这在一定程度损害了我国司法的权威性和公信力。因此对这类纠纷问题进行深入研究有着重要的现实意义。本文主要围绕我国有限责任公司股东资格司法确认的主要证据和裁判规则展开,从股东资格确认的理论基础分析入手,进一步明确股东资格司法确认的法律意义和价值所在。在对域外观点进行比较、借鉴的基础上,以表征股东资格的形式证据和实质证据为中心,对股东名册、公司章程、工商登记、实际出资行为、出资证明书、实际行使股权等各种证据的证据效力进行法律分析,总结出有限责任公司股东资格司法确认在证据法角度下的证据适用规则。并以此为基础,结合我国司法实务,对司法实践中的股东资格确认纠纷裁判规则予以了阐释和说明。认为法院在审理该类纠纷案件中,首先应就该纠纷的性质予以区分判断,分析该纠纷是属于公司内部的纠纷还是缠绕于外部的争议,再依循民法的私法自治原则和商法的外观主义原则,探求当事方的合意,保护善意第三方的利益,采用与之相适应的“优先适用形式证据,个别适用实质证据”的证据适用规则,根据相关的形式证据或实质证据,对有限责任公司的股东资格的确认问题予以公正合理的处理和解决。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing number of shareholder qualification disputes in limited liability companies, How to reasonably solve the specific confirmation of shareholders' qualification has become an increasingly concerned problem in the theoretical and practical circles. Because of the lack of clear definition of shareholders' qualification in the current company legislation, The Supreme people's Court has also failed to issue a judicial interpretation of the basis for the confirmation of shareholders' qualifications. As a result, in judicial practice, courts in various localities have their own judgments, and there is a large number of phenomena in which the basis of adjudication is extremely inconsistent. This has damaged the judicial authority and credibility of our country to a certain extent. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to conduct in-depth study on this kind of disputes. This paper mainly focuses on the judicial confirmation of shareholder qualification of limited liability companies in China. Main evidence and rules of adjudication, From the theoretical basis analysis of shareholder qualification confirmation, the legal significance and value of shareholder qualification judicial confirmation are further clarified. Focusing on formal and substantive evidence to characterize the qualifications of shareholders, legal analysis is made on the evidentiary effectiveness of such evidence as the register of shareholders, articles of association of companies, industrial and commercial registration, actual capital contribution behavior, capital contribution certificate, actual exercise of equity, etc., This paper sums up the applicable rules of evidence under the angle of evidence law for judicial confirmation of shareholders' qualification of limited liability company. On this basis, it combines the judicial practice of our country. This paper explains and explains the adjudication rules of shareholder qualification confirmation dispute in judicial practice. It is considered that the court should distinguish the nature of the dispute in the trial of the dispute. This paper analyzes whether the dispute belongs to the internal dispute of the company or is entangled in the external dispute, and then according to the principle of autonomy of private law of civil law and the principle of outward appearance of commercial law, it explores the agreement of the parties and protects the interests of bona fide third parties. Applying the rules of evidence applicable to "preferential application of formal evidence, individual application of substantive evidence", in accordance with relevant formal or material evidence, To the limited liability company shareholder qualification confirmation question gives the fair and reasonable processing and the solution.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】