司法审判视野下的表见代理制度
发布时间:2018-04-13 11:50
本文选题:司法审判 + 表见代理 ; 参考:《贵州大学》2008年硕士论文
【摘要】: 代理制度是民商法的一项重要制度。代理制度的出现,弥补了人的能力之不足,扩张了人的能力,避免了事必躬亲的束缚,为社会化的精细分工奠定了法律基础。但作为代理伴生物的无权代理则妨碍了代理权的行使,导致了交易的不安全,损害了被代理人的利益。传统民法理论将无权代理分为表见代理和狭义的无权代理。我国的《民法通则》并未直接规定表见代理制度,《合同法》第49条规定:“行为人没有代理权、超越代理权或代理权终止后,以被代理人名义订立的合同,相对人有理由相信行为人有代理权的,该代理行为有效”,由此正式确立了表见代理制度。但《合同法》对表见代理构成要件等诸多具体问题未作出进一步规定,在民法理论界引发了争论和分歧;在民商事司法审判实践中,对于表见代理的认定与判决也出现了不同的倾向,体现出当前民商事司法审判实践中对该制度在认识、理解、掌握和适用上的困惑。因此,厘清并以点及面地从中找出共性问题并解决这些困惑,以及以此为基础进一步研究表见代理的构成要件等具有重要的理论和现实意义。
[Abstract]:Agency system is an important system of civil and commercial law.The emergence of agency system makes up for the deficiency of human ability, expands human ability, avoids the bondage of hands-on, and lays a legal foundation for the fine division of labor in socialization.However, the unauthorized agent, as the concomitant of agent, hinders the exercise of agency right, leads to the insecurity of transaction and damages the interests of the principal.Traditional civil law theory divides unauthorized agent into apparent agency and narrow sense unauthorized agent.The General principles of Civil Law of our country do not directly stipulate the system of apparent agency. Article 49 of the contract Law stipulates that: "A contract concluded in the name of the principal without the agent's power of attorney, exceeding the agent's right or termination of the agency's right,"If the relative party has reason to believe that the agent has the agency right, the agency act is valid.However, the contract Law has not made further provisions on the elements of apparent agency, which has caused controversy and disagreement in the civil law theoretical circle, and in the practice of civil and commercial judicial trial,There are different tendencies in the identification and judgment of apparent agency, which reflects the confusion of understanding, understanding, mastering and application of this system in the current judicial practice of civil and commercial affairs.Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to clarify and find out the common problems and solve these puzzles, and to further study the constitutive elements of apparent agency on this basis.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 谭玲;论表见代理的定性及表象形态[J];当代法学;2001年01期
2 杨婉萍;表见代理若干问题研究[J];河北法学;2000年05期
3 屠世超;表见代理若干问题研究[J];国际商务研究;2003年01期
4 董瑜芳;表见代理的表现及其归责原则[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2002年02期
5 成殿军;表见代理问题探析[J];唯实;2003年03期
6 宋宗宇;表见代理的法律适用——评最高人民法院[法公布(2002)第30号]民事判决[J];政法论丛;2004年04期
7 汪世虎,徐英;表见代理制度之功能新探[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2004年03期
8 孙鹏;表见代理构成要件新论——以被代理人的过错问题为中心[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2004年01期
,本文编号:1744367
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1744367.html