论船舶抵押权的侵害及其法律保护

发布时间：2018-05-05 01:06

本文选题：船舶 + 抵押权　；参考：《华东政法学院》2002年硕士论文

【摘要】：在船舶上设定抵押权，作为船舶所有人融资手段以及其他债务人向债权人提供担保的重要手段之一，正越来越广范地加以利用。但由于海商法一系列制度的确立，大都体现了对从事航运业者的偏爱，其基本法律价值取向是重效益，但也难免存在轻视公平的弊端。纵观船舶抵押权制度，虽然在设计时亦考虑到抵押关系中各方利益的平衡，但是对他的保护却失之周全。本文试图通过对船舶抵押权受侵害的类型及救济的完善、船舶抵押权与船舶优先权、船舶留置权的利益冲突和衡平、船舶抵押权人在拍卖船舶以清偿债务中的困境及程序上救济之缺失等方面问题的探讨，以完善法律，从而加强对船舶抵押权人的法律保护。本文除导言和结语外，共分五章。第一章在界定船舶抵押权的概念的基础上，，阐述了船舶抵押权的特点、属性和历史沿革，并分析了《海商法》中的船舶抵押权和《担保法》中抵押权的法律价值的冲突与衡平。第二章分别阐述了船舶抵押权受侵害的法理基础、类型，检讨船舶抵押权物上代位和抵押船舶之保险保障方面的缺失，并提出完善相关法律的建议。第三章讨论了船舶优先权对船舶抵押权效力之影响，提出了应压缩船舶优先权之项目已提高船舶抵押权人地位之建议。第四章阐述了船舶留置权对船舶抵押权效力之影响，对理论界和实务界将所有的以船舶作为客体的权利均定位为船舶留置权的观点予以批评，并就船舶留置权与船舶抵押权利益冲突与协调予以讨论。第五章就实务中船舶抵押权人在拍卖船舶以清偿债务时易引起混乱的相关问题如“未经登记，不得对抗第三人”中第三人范围的界定，与拍卖船舶有关债权人范围的界定等问题进行辨析，以防止做扩大解释而削弱船舶抵押权之效力，并检讨了《海诉法》中有关对船舶抵押权人保护不力之规定，提出了加强对船舶抵押权人法律保护的若干建议。
[Abstract]:As a means of financing ship owners and other debtors providing security to creditors, mortgage on ships is being used more and more widely. However, because of the establishment of a series of systems of maritime law, most of them reflect the preference of the people engaged in the shipping industry, whose basic legal value orientation is the emphasis on efficiency, but it is also inevitable that it has the disadvantage of belittling fairness. Throughout the ship mortgage system, although the balance of the interests of all parties in the mortgage relationship is taken into account in the design, its protection is inadequate. This paper attempts to improve the types and remedies of the infringement of ship mortgage, the conflict of interest and balance between ship mortgage and maritime lien, In order to perfect the law and strengthen the legal protection of the mortgagee of the ship, the mortgagee of the ship probes into the difficulties in the auction of the ship in order to pay off the debts and the lack of relief in the procedure. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five chapters. On the basis of defining the concept of ship mortgage, the first chapter expounds the characteristics, attributes and historical evolution of ship mortgage, and analyzes the conflict and balance between the legal value of ship mortgage in Maritime Law and the legal value of mortgage in the Law of Guaranty. The second chapter expounds the legal basis and types of the infringement of the ship mortgage, reviews the subrogation of the ship mortgage and the lack of the insurance protection of the mortgaged ship, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the relevant laws. Chapter three discusses the influence of maritime lien on the validity of ship mortgage, and puts forward some suggestions on how to reduce the items of maritime lien to improve the status of mortgagee. The fourth chapter expounds the influence of ship lien on the validity of ship mortgage. To criticize the view that the rights of the ship as its object are defined as the lien of the ship, and to comment on the relationship between the right of lien on the ship and the right of lien of the ship The conflict of interest and coordination of ship mortgage are discussed. Chapter five deals with the related problems that the mortgagee of a ship is liable to cause confusion when auctioning the ship to pay off its debts in practice Definition of the scope of third parties in "unregistered, not against third parties", creditors relating to the auction of ships In order to prevent the extension of the interpretation and weaken the effectiveness of the mortgage of the ship, the definition of the perimeter and other issues are analyzed, and a review has also been made. The provisions of the Sea suit Law concerning the inadequate protection of the mortgagee of the ship put forward the strengthening of the Law on the mortgagee of the ship. Some suggestions for legal protection.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2002
【分类号】：D922.294;D923

【相似文献】