绕航法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 22:19

本文选题：绕航 + 合理性　；参考：《大连海事大学》2000年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文是为了解决在我国的相关法律制度下，如何来判定绕航是否合理，以及如果绕航被认定为不合理，，承运人享受免责、责任限制和一年时效的权利如何。文章内容总体可以分为三大部分，第一部分首先论述了绕航的识别及合理性的认定、自由条款的效力等问题；第二部分则主要论述了关于不合理绕航的传统理论的发展以及不合理绕航的法律后果；第三部分是对如何完善我国《海商法》第四章有关绕航的规定以及面对绕航的法律后果，承运人应采取的对策提出自己的合理化建议。考虑到甲板货运输和转船运输与地理绕航在违约的严重性方面的相似之处及长期以来人们一直将甲板货运输和转船运输冠之以“准绕航”的习惯称谓，本文亦将其纳入到绕航的范畴内来进行研究，希冀能给法院或相关各方在解决此类问题时提供有益的思路或启迪。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to solve the problem of how to determine whether deviation is reasonable under the relevant legal system of our country, and how the carrier enjoys the right of exemption, limitation of liability and one-year limitation if the deviation is considered unreasonable. The content of the article can be divided into three parts. The first part discusses the identification and rationality of deviation, the validity of the freedom clause and so on. The second part mainly discusses the development of the traditional theory of unreasonable deviation and the legal consequences of unreasonable deviation. The carrier should take the countermeasures to put forward their own rationalization proposals. Taking into account the similarities between deck cargo transport and transshipment and geographical deviation in respect of the gravity of the breach and the customary designation of deck cargo transport and transshipment as "quasi-deviation" for a long time, This paper also brings it into the scope of deviation to carry on the research, hoping that it can provide useful ideas or enlightenment to the court or relevant parties in solving this kind of problem.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2000
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】