论海上保险代位求偿权之限制性法律规定

发布时间：2018-06-23 20:13

本文选题：代位求偿权 + 海上保险　；参考：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在国际贸易当中，海上货物运输方式始终占据着重要的地位，发挥着航空运输，陆路运输多不能替代的作用，随着世界经济发展，各国，各州之间的贸易愈加频繁和密切，国际合作、国际分工在当今社会越来越在国际经济发展的模式中扮演者越来越重要的作用。各国的海商法以及《海牙规则》、《维斯比规则》、《汉堡规则》、《鹿特丹规则》都是用来规范各国与各国之间的海上运输的法律和条约。众所周知，海上运输风险大，路途长，因此海上保险一直是海上运输相关法律中必不可少的一部分，海上保险的存在对于保护被保险人的合法利益，减轻损失具有重大作用。而这其中的海上保险代位求偿权一直是海上保险中的热点，也一直是海上保险中的重点内容。本文主要是在参考国内外诸多学者关于海上保险代位求偿权规定的基础之上，以及研习了中国法律和英国，美国以及大陆法系国家的法律对于海上保险代位求偿权的规定，而且在参考了英国以及其他国家的相关案例的基础之上，对于海上保险代位求偿权尤其是海上保险代位求偿权限制方面做出了自己的论述。首先，我从总体上概述了海上保险代位求偿权内容，这样一来，对下文的论述有一个良好的铺垫。然后，，我主要从海上保险代位求偿权的成立的规定，以及权利行使的规定几个方面来论述海上保险代位求偿权的限制方面，其在满足了什么条件之后方可成立此权利，方可行使此权利；最后，我重点从权利行使的一个方面，即通过诉讼的方式行使海上保险代位求偿权来论述其对此方面的论述和规定，在此基础之上，全面分析海上保险代位求偿权的限制性的规定。英国是海商法和海上保险发展较早的国家之一，其《1906年的英国海上保险法》对于众多国家和世界上的海上保险发展有着非常重大的意义和作用。而我国目前对于海上保险代位求偿权的规定不甚详细，主要包括《中华人民共和国海商法》、《中华人民共和国保险法》、《中华人民共和国海事诉讼特别程序法》，这其中前两者主要是对海上保险代位求偿权之实体权利作出规定，而后者是对海上保险代位求偿权之程序法做出了相应的规定。海上保险代位求偿权对于海上保险，对于海上保险的保险人以及对于整个海上运输都具有十分重要的意义，本文力图在结合中外海商相关法律规定以及司法案件的实例来分析其内容和对其的各方面的限制性的规定，并愿本文能够为中国甚至国际上海上保险代位求偿权、海上保险法、海商法的发展贡献微薄之力。
[Abstract]:In international trade, the mode of carriage of goods by sea has always occupied an important position and played an irreplaceable role in air transport and land transport. With the development of world economy, trade between states has become more and more frequent and close. International cooperation and international division of labor play a more and more important role in the pattern of international economic development. The maritime laws of various countries, as well as the Hague rules, the Visby rules, the Hamburg rules and the Rotterdam rules, are laws and treaties used to regulate the maritime transport between countries. As we all know, the risk of marine transportation is high and the road is long, so marine insurance has always been an indispensable part of the relevant laws of maritime transport. The existence of marine insurance plays a significant role in protecting the legitimate interests of the insured and reducing losses. The subrogation of marine insurance has always been a hot spot in marine insurance, and has always been the focus of marine insurance. Based on the reference of many scholars at home and abroad about the subrogation right of marine insurance, this paper also studies the provisions of Chinese law and the law of the United Kingdom, the United States and the countries of civil law system on the subrogation of marine insurance. On the basis of referring to the relevant cases of Britain and other countries, this paper discusses the subrogation of marine insurance, especially the limitation of subrogation of marine insurance. First of all, I summarize the content of marine insurance subrogation as a whole. Then, I mainly discuss the limitation of marine insurance subrogation from the provisions of the establishment of marine insurance subrogation, as well as the provisions of the exercise of rights. What conditions have been satisfied before the establishment of this right? Finally, I will focus on one aspect of the exercise of the right, namely, the right to subrogation of marine insurance by way of litigation, on the basis of which, A comprehensive analysis of marine insurance subrogation of the restrictive provisions. Britain is one of the countries that developed maritime law and marine insurance earlier. Its < 1906 British marine insurance law has great significance and function for the development of marine insurance in many countries and the world. However, at present, the provisions on subrogation of marine insurance in China are not very detailed. It mainly includes the Maritime Law of the people's Republic of China, the Insurance Law of the people's Republic of China, and the Special procedure Law of the Maritime Litigation of the people's Republic of China. And the latter makes the corresponding stipulation to the marine insurance subrogation right procedure law. The subrogation of marine insurance is of great significance to marine insurance, to the insurer of marine insurance and to the whole marine transportation. This paper tries to analyze its contents and restrictive regulations by combining the relevant laws and regulations of Chinese and foreign maritime merchants as well as the examples of judicial cases, and hopes that this article can be used as a subrogation right for China and even for Shanghai, the law of marine insurance. The development of maritime law contributes little to it.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】