论商事法上的严格责任
发布时间：2018-12-21 10:42
【摘要】：严格责任最初作为契约法上的责任源于罗马法,17世纪以后,商事实践中形成的严格责任在各国商事立法中确立,现代商法上的严格责任制度并不仅仅局限于契约法上的严格责任,也不同于侵权行为法上的无过错责任。本文主要论述严格责任制度在各国立法中主要体现为无过错责任、连带责任、以及特定主体责任的严格性等。严格责任制度通过建立激励机制以及外部性内在化两个途径提高商事活动的效率。因此,严格责任制度在保障交易安全、促进交易方面具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Strict liability originated from Roman law as the responsibility of contract law. After the 17th century, the strict liability formed in commercial practice was established in the commercial legislation of various countries. The strict liability system in modern commercial law is not only limited to the strict liability in the contract law, but also different from the no-fault liability in the tort law. This paper mainly discusses the strict liability system in the legislation of various countries, such as no-fault liability, joint liability, as well as the strictness of specific subject liability. Strict liability system improves the efficiency of commercial activities by establishing incentive mechanism and internalizing externality. Therefore, strict liability system is of great significance in ensuring the security of transactions and promoting transactions.
【作者单位】： 河北大学图书馆;
【分类号】：D913.99
[Abstract]:Strict liability originated from Roman law as the responsibility of contract law. After the 17th century, the strict liability formed in commercial practice was established in the commercial legislation of various countries. The strict liability system in modern commercial law is not only limited to the strict liability in the contract law, but also different from the no-fault liability in the tort law. This paper mainly discusses the strict liability system in the legislation of various countries, such as no-fault liability, joint liability, as well as the strictness of specific subject liability. Strict liability system improves the efficiency of commercial activities by establishing incentive mechanism and internalizing externality. Therefore, strict liability system is of great significance in ensuring the security of transactions and promoting transactions.
【作者单位】： 河北大学图书馆;
【分类号】：D913.99
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申惠文;;驳民法宪法新同位论[J];安徽大学法律评论;2008年02期
2 何承斌;;试论人权的刑法保障的若干问题[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
3 郑德新;“法的起源”不等于“法意识的起源”——兼论关于“法的起源”争论的误区[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年01期
4 周方伦;刍议法官独立[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年02期
5 陈克军;;合同债权性质研究[J];安徽电子信息职业技术学院学报;2008年03期
6 曹晓东;张清;;浅议侦查阶段的司法审查制度[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
7 郭莉;崔强;;乌江流域农业水权的法律保障制度研究[J];安徽农业科学;2010年01期
8 张，
本文编号：2388798
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2388798.html
