有限公司隐名股东法律资格认定
发布时间：2019-01-27 20:55
【摘要】：投资者出于各种原因,选择以他人名义向有限公司出资,隐名投资现象在实务中十分常见。对于隐名出资人是否能够获得股东资格,以及隐名出资人与名义股东之间的纠纷处理途径,由于没有法律加以统一,司法中个案差异较大,理论界也有着多种处理标准。现存规范与学说或在法理中存在缺陷,或于逻辑上无法涵盖周延,不能正确、统一地指导实践。本文在介绍隐名投资现象之基础上,全面评价、分析了现有理论与实务,并给出了认定隐名股东法律地位具体而可操作的标准。 第一章是对隐名投资的概述。本章给出了本文中对于隐名股东的界定,划定了研究的外延,并描述了体现隐名股东共性的一般法律特征。 第二章是隐名股东的实务状态。通过三个相关而不相同的案例设置,初步总结出司法机关对于隐名投资纠纷的考察要和基本裁判思路。 第三章探讨了股东资格认定的基本原则与判断要件,为后文分析相关理论并得出结论做一铺垫。本章首先分析了设计制度时应遵循的一般原则和基本价值,包括维护公司法律关系的稳定性、保持各方主体的利益平衡和坚持商事法律的公示主义与外观主义;而后根据实践中有限公司股东的一般特征,类型化地分析了认定隐名投资人法律地位的判断要件。 第四章是隐名股东法律资格认定的理论学说与现行规范。笔者将相关学说归纳为形式要件说、实质要件说和区别说,而后简要介绍了最高院的《征求意见稿》的相关规定,并认为各学说与理论都有其合理性与局限性,从而引出本文研究结论。 第五章是结论性的阐述,给出了隐名股东法律资格的具体认定标准。笔者将法律关系种类化,从而归纳出可能存在的相应纠纷类型,并就各种纠纷相应给出了符合民法、商法的价值追求,而又可以一元地、确定地指导司法实践、指引投资行为的裁判标准。
[Abstract]:For various reasons, investors choose to invest in limited companies in the name of others. Anonymous investment is very common in practice. As to whether the dormant investor can obtain the qualification of shareholders and the way to deal with the dispute between the anonymous investor and the nominal shareholder, there are many kinds of standards in the theory circle because there is no law to unify the cases in the judicature. The existing norms and doctrines have defects in jurisprudence, or they can not be covered logically and can not guide practice correctly and uniformly. On the basis of introducing the phenomenon of anonymous investment, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation, analyzes the existing theory and practice, and gives the concrete and operable criteria for determining the legal status of dormant shareholders. The first chapter is an overview of anonymous investment. This chapter gives the definition of dormant shareholders in this paper, defines the extension of the research, and describes the general legal characteristics that reflect the common characteristics of anonymous shareholders. The second chapter is the practice state of dormant shareholders. Through three related and different case settings, this paper preliminarily summarizes the judicial investigation of anonymous investment disputes and the basic thinking of adjudication. The third chapter discusses the basic principles and judgment elements of shareholder qualification, which paves the way for the later analysis of relevant theories and conclusions. This chapter first analyzes the general principles and basic values that should be followed in the design of the system, including maintaining the stability of the company's legal relations, maintaining the balance of the interests of all parties and upholding the publicism and externalism of commercial law. Then, according to the general characteristics of shareholders of limited company in practice, this paper categorically analyzes the judgment elements of determining the legal status of dormant investors. The fourth chapter is the theoretical theory and current norms of the legal qualification of dormant shareholders. The author sums up the relevant theories as formal elements, substantive elements and distinction, and then briefly introduces the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court's draft of soliciting opinions, and thinks that all theories and theories have their rationality and limitations. Thus leads to the conclusion of this paper. The fifth chapter is the conclusion elaboration, has given the hidden name shareholder legal qualification concrete confirmation standard. The author classifies the legal relationship and concludes the corresponding types of disputes which may exist, and gives the corresponding value pursuit in accordance with the civil law and the commercial law, and can guide the judicial practice in a certain way. The standard of judgment that guides investment behavior.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2416692
[Abstract]:For various reasons, investors choose to invest in limited companies in the name of others. Anonymous investment is very common in practice. As to whether the dormant investor can obtain the qualification of shareholders and the way to deal with the dispute between the anonymous investor and the nominal shareholder, there are many kinds of standards in the theory circle because there is no law to unify the cases in the judicature. The existing norms and doctrines have defects in jurisprudence, or they can not be covered logically and can not guide practice correctly and uniformly. On the basis of introducing the phenomenon of anonymous investment, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation, analyzes the existing theory and practice, and gives the concrete and operable criteria for determining the legal status of dormant shareholders. The first chapter is an overview of anonymous investment. This chapter gives the definition of dormant shareholders in this paper, defines the extension of the research, and describes the general legal characteristics that reflect the common characteristics of anonymous shareholders. The second chapter is the practice state of dormant shareholders. Through three related and different case settings, this paper preliminarily summarizes the judicial investigation of anonymous investment disputes and the basic thinking of adjudication. The third chapter discusses the basic principles and judgment elements of shareholder qualification, which paves the way for the later analysis of relevant theories and conclusions. This chapter first analyzes the general principles and basic values that should be followed in the design of the system, including maintaining the stability of the company's legal relations, maintaining the balance of the interests of all parties and upholding the publicism and externalism of commercial law. Then, according to the general characteristics of shareholders of limited company in practice, this paper categorically analyzes the judgment elements of determining the legal status of dormant investors. The fourth chapter is the theoretical theory and current norms of the legal qualification of dormant shareholders. The author sums up the relevant theories as formal elements, substantive elements and distinction, and then briefly introduces the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court's draft of soliciting opinions, and thinks that all theories and theories have their rationality and limitations. Thus leads to the conclusion of this paper. The fifth chapter is the conclusion elaboration, has given the hidden name shareholder legal qualification concrete confirmation standard. The author classifies the legal relationship and concludes the corresponding types of disputes which may exist, and gives the corresponding value pursuit in accordance with the civil law and the commercial law, and can guide the judicial practice in a certain way. The standard of judgment that guides investment behavior.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 周友苏;;试析股东资格认定中的若干法律问题[J];法学;2006年12期
2 ;有限责任公司股东资格的认定[J];法律适用;2002年12期
3 虞政平;股东资格的法律确认[J];法律适用;2003年08期
4 王成勇,陈广秀;隐名股东之资格认定若干问题探析[J];法律适用;2004年07期
，本文编号：2416692
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2416692.html
