《鹿特丹规则》下承运人无单放货法律责任研究

发布时间：2019-02-13 19:48

【摘要】：无论是国际公约还是各国的相关法律规定,一般都将凭正本提单放货作为承运人遵守运输合同的一种强制义务。如果无单放货则会构成违约,但是由于现在科技的发展,船速和海运效率大大提高等原因,无正本提单交货成为海洋运输合同中的一个重大问题。而《鹿特丹规则》的出台则是欲使承运人无单放货合法化,与现行做法有着根本性的不同,对于我国的《海商法》以及实践中对承运人无单放货责任的规定和认定都将产生重要影响。本文的第一部分主要是介绍承运人无单放货责任,在其中笔者对提单的涵义,无单放货的涵义及界定,承运人无单放货责任都做了论述;第二部分笔者将《汉堡规则》《维斯比规则》和《海牙规则》放在一起进行了论述,为了跟《鹿特丹规则》进行比较,从而认识到《鹿特丹规则》对于承运人无单放货责任规定的特别之处;本文的第三部分为文章的重要部分,笔者以《鹿特丹规则》为切入点,论述了《鹿特丹规则》下的承运人无单放货责任,并且分析了规定中的优缺点,这对我们分析鹿特丹规则在我国的可行性是很有必要的;分析问题的最终目的还是为了解决问题,故本文的最后一部分主要是介绍了《鹿特丹规则》对我国海商法以及承运人无单放货责任规定的借鉴,也提出了对于无单放货如何解决的几点建议。
[Abstract]:The original bill of lading is generally regarded as a compulsory obligation for the carrier to abide by the contract of carriage. Delivery without bill of lading will be a breach of contract, but due to the development of science and technology, the speed and efficiency of shipping are greatly improved, the delivery of non-original bill of lading has become a major problem in the maritime transport contract. The Rotterdam rules are fundamentally different from the current practice in order to legalize the delivery of goods by the carrier without a bill of lading. It will have an important influence on the maritime law of our country and the stipulation and confirmation of carrier's liability to release goods without bill of lading in practice. The first part of this paper mainly introduces the carrier's liability of delivery without bill of lading, in which the author discusses the meaning of bill of lading, the meaning and definition of the delivery of goods without bill of lading, and the carrier's liability of delivery without bill of lading. In the second part, the author discusses the Hamburg rules and the Hague rules together, in order to compare them with the Rotterdam rules. Thus recognizing the special features of the Rotterdam rules with regard to the carrier's liability for delivery without a bill of lading; The third part of this paper is the important part of the article. The author discusses the carrier's liability for delivery of goods without bill of lading under the Rotterdam rules, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the regulations. It is necessary for us to analyze the feasibility of Rotterdam rule in our country. The ultimate purpose of analyzing the problem is to solve the problem, so the last part of this paper mainly introduces the reference of the Rotterdam rules to the maritime law of our country and the carrier's liability to deliver goods without bill. It also puts forward some suggestions on how to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】