有限责任公司中有关实际出资人纠纷问题研究
发布时间：2019-06-13 17:09
【摘要】：隐名出资现象是社会主义市场经济发展的必然产物，由于隐名投资现象的特殊性与复杂性，实际出资并享有投资权益的实际出资人和登记于公司的股东相分离的情况，因此导致在长时间的司法实践中，由于隐名出资而引发的纠纷越来越多。长久以来，我国的公司法律制度不否定隐名出资现象的存在，但是也没有立法对该现象予以规范，2011年，最高人民法院颁布《关于适用中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定(三)》对有关实际出资人的相关问题有了初步的法律规制，在解决由于隐名出资而引发的实际出资人与各方利益主体之间的纠纷中发挥了重要的作用，但是本身仍然存在瑕疵与缺漏，本文通过对有关实际出资人有可能产生的纠纷进行分析，并对比《公司法解释三》的相关规定，，对完善我国有关实际出资人法律制度进行思考。 本文主要包括引言、正文、结语三个部分，其中论文的正文分为四个部分进行论述： 第一部分：主要介绍关于实际出资人的基本理论，从分析实际出资人的基本内涵、法律特征、以及产生的原因入手，对实际出资人形成最基本的认识与了解，也为后文分析有关实际出资人的纠纷问题打下基础 第二部分：主要分析有关实际出资人与名义股东之间的纠纷及处理方式，实际出资人与名义出资人的关系是整个隐名出资问题中最为基础的关系，由于他们之间存在一个隐名出资协议，双方互负权利义务，因此，他们之间产生纠纷的可能性最大。通过对《公司法解释三》现有规定的不足的评析，本文认为，引进股权信托制度是有效解决实际出资人与名义出资人之间的有效途径。 第三部分：介绍实际出资人与公司及公司其他股东之间的纠纷，当实际出资人向公司主张欲成为显名股东时，不免会与公司其他股东之间发生纠纷，并且，当实际出资人未向公司全面履行出资义务时，公司应该向实际出资人还是名义出资人主张权利，《公司法解释三》规定并不详尽，本文分析了该司法解释的不足之处，并提出自己的观点。 第四部分：本部分主要介绍了实际出资人与公司及公司以外第三人所产生的纠纷，关于这一情况，不管是现有立法还是本文观点，都主张由于商法的外观主义原则，善意第三人的信赖利益应该得到合理保护。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of anonymous capital contribution is the inevitable product of the development of socialist market economy. Because of the particularity and complexity of the phenomenon of anonymous investment, the actual investors who actually contribute and enjoy investment rights and interests are separated from the shareholders registered in the company, which leads to more and more disputes caused by anonymous investment in judicial practice for a long time. For a long time, the corporate legal system of our country does not deny the existence of the phenomenon of anonymous capital contribution, but there is no legislation to regulate this phenomenon. In 2011, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3), which has a preliminary legal regulation on the relevant issues related to the actual investors. It has played an important role in solving the disputes between the actual investors and the interest subjects of all parties caused by the anonymous capital contribution, but there are still defects and gaps in themselves. This paper analyzes the disputes that may arise from the actual investors, and compares the relevant provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law to perfect the legal system of the actual investors in our country. This paper mainly includes three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion, in which the main body of the paper is divided into four parts to discuss: the first part mainly introduces the basic theory of the actual investors, starting with the analysis of the basic connotation, legal characteristics and causes of the actual investors, the most basic understanding and understanding of the formation of the actual investors. It also lays the foundation for the following analysis of the disputes between the actual investors and the nominal shareholders. The relationship between the actual investors and the nominal investors is the most basic relationship in the whole anonymous capital contribution problem. Because of the existence of an anonymous capital contribution agreement between them, the two sides have mutual rights and obligations, therefore, the relationship between the actual investors and the nominal investors is the most basic relationship in the whole anonymous capital contribution problem. Because there is an anonymous capital contribution agreement between them, the two sides have mutual rights and obligations. They are the most likely to have a dispute with each other. Through the analysis of the shortcomings of the existing provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law, this paper holds that the introduction of equity trust system is an effective way to solve the problem between the actual investors and the nominal investors. The third part introduces the disputes between the actual investors and the company and other shareholders of the company. When the actual investors claim to the company that they want to become prominent shareholders, there will inevitably be disputes with other shareholders of the company, and when the actual investors fail to fully fulfill their capital contribution obligations to the company, the company should claim the rights from the actual investors or the nominal investors, and the provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law are not detailed. This paper analyzes the shortcomings of the judicial interpretation and puts forward its own views. The fourth part mainly introduces the disputes between the actual investors and the company and the third party outside the company. About this situation, both the existing legislation and this point of view advocate that the trust interests of the bona fide third party should be reasonably protected because of the externalism principle of commercial law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2498676
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of anonymous capital contribution is the inevitable product of the development of socialist market economy. Because of the particularity and complexity of the phenomenon of anonymous investment, the actual investors who actually contribute and enjoy investment rights and interests are separated from the shareholders registered in the company, which leads to more and more disputes caused by anonymous investment in judicial practice for a long time. For a long time, the corporate legal system of our country does not deny the existence of the phenomenon of anonymous capital contribution, but there is no legislation to regulate this phenomenon. In 2011, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (3), which has a preliminary legal regulation on the relevant issues related to the actual investors. It has played an important role in solving the disputes between the actual investors and the interest subjects of all parties caused by the anonymous capital contribution, but there are still defects and gaps in themselves. This paper analyzes the disputes that may arise from the actual investors, and compares the relevant provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law to perfect the legal system of the actual investors in our country. This paper mainly includes three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion, in which the main body of the paper is divided into four parts to discuss: the first part mainly introduces the basic theory of the actual investors, starting with the analysis of the basic connotation, legal characteristics and causes of the actual investors, the most basic understanding and understanding of the formation of the actual investors. It also lays the foundation for the following analysis of the disputes between the actual investors and the nominal shareholders. The relationship between the actual investors and the nominal investors is the most basic relationship in the whole anonymous capital contribution problem. Because of the existence of an anonymous capital contribution agreement between them, the two sides have mutual rights and obligations, therefore, the relationship between the actual investors and the nominal investors is the most basic relationship in the whole anonymous capital contribution problem. Because there is an anonymous capital contribution agreement between them, the two sides have mutual rights and obligations. They are the most likely to have a dispute with each other. Through the analysis of the shortcomings of the existing provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law, this paper holds that the introduction of equity trust system is an effective way to solve the problem between the actual investors and the nominal investors. The third part introduces the disputes between the actual investors and the company and other shareholders of the company. When the actual investors claim to the company that they want to become prominent shareholders, there will inevitably be disputes with other shareholders of the company, and when the actual investors fail to fully fulfill their capital contribution obligations to the company, the company should claim the rights from the actual investors or the nominal investors, and the provisions of the third interpretation of the Company Law are not detailed. This paper analyzes the shortcomings of the judicial interpretation and puts forward its own views. The fourth part mainly introduces the disputes between the actual investors and the company and the third party outside the company. About this situation, both the existing legislation and this point of view advocate that the trust interests of the bona fide third party should be reasonably protected because of the externalism principle of commercial law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 虞政平;股东资格的法律确认[J];法律适用;2003年08期
2 赵旭东;顾东伟;;隐名出资的法律关系及其效力认定[J];国家检察官学院学报;2011年02期
3 赵磊;;公司诉讼中的法律解释——以隐名股东法律问题为例[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 周荃;有限责任公司股东资格法律制度研究[D];武汉大学;2010年
本文编号：2498676
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2498676.html
