宪法个案解释基准的证成逻辑及其法律控制

发布时间：2018-06-10 20:49

本文选题：宪法解释 + 宪法个案基准　；参考：《中国法学》2016年06期

【摘要】：何为宪法解释基准?广义上包括既定规范、技术规范和个案规范,狭义上就是个案规范。其中,个案规范潜藏于既定规范与案件事实之中,是解释者通过技术规范选择甚至续造的个案基准。在个案规范的证成中,案件事实给定了求证的起点和目标,既定规范预设了求证的方向和边界,技术规范指明了求证的路径与方法。宪法原则是一个多位阶、网状式的价值体系和规范体系,在逻辑推论中,上位原则涵摄下位原则、原则涵摄规则。权利(职权)关系的主体、行为和法益,是法律拟制事实与案件事实的基本元素,也是宪法规范涵摄法律规范和案件事实的桥梁和纽带。个案规范的选择和续造,解释者说了算。因此,提高宪法规范的可适用性、推进技术规范的法律化以及释宪程序的民主化等,是控制恣意释宪的主要途径。
[Abstract]:What is the standard of constitutional interpretation? In a broad sense, it includes established norms, technical specifications and case norms, and in a narrow sense it is a case norm. Case norms, which are hidden in the established norms and the facts of the case, are the basis for the interpreters to select or even renew the case through technical norms. In the case of standard evidence, the facts of the case give the starting point and goal of verification, the established norms presuppose the direction and boundary of verification, and the technical specification indicates the path and method of verification. The constitutional principle is a multi-rank, net-like value system and a normative system. In logical inference, the upper principle contains the subordinate principle and the principle embodies the rule. The subject, behavior and legal interest of the relation of right (power) are the basic elements of the fact of the law and the fact of the case, and the bridge and link between the constitutional norm and the legal norm and the fact of the case. The choice and continuation of the case norms shall be decided by the interpreter. Therefore, to improve the applicability of constitutional norms, to promote the legalization of technical norms and to democratize the process of constitutional interpretation are the main ways to control unscrupulous constitutional interpretation.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D921

【相似文献】