当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 宪法论文 >

论健康权的宪法保障

发布时间:2018-07-13 08:32
【摘要】:健康权是基本人权,其主体不仅仅局限于一国公民,而是全人类,各国在履行健康权保护义务时,呈现出不同的状况。在我国,健康权尚未上升到宪法规范层面,成为公民的基本权利,故其不具有宪法权利所拥有的功能及效力,其保障自然也就不足。本文以为应为健康权提供宪法保障,将其入宪以获得宪法的确认。生存质量论、自然法思想、宪法权利的三大功能是健康权宪法保障的重要理论基础;同时国家生活、时代要求、基本权利体系及部门法的完善、履行国际义务的需要也是健康权宪法保障的重要理由。使健康权成为宪法权利只是第一步,重要的是使国家承担相应的义务,国家义务的是否履行,对于健康权的尊重、实现、保护至关重要。制定统一健康卫生法、解决相关司法局限性、落实行政机关和司法机关的保护义务,对于健康权的实现具有十分重要的作用。
[Abstract]:The right to health is a basic human right, and its subject is not only confined to the citizens of a country, but also to all mankind. In China, the right to health has not yet risen to the level of constitutional norms and has become a basic right of citizens, so it does not have the function and effect of constitutional rights, and its protection is naturally inadequate. This paper argues that the right to health should be provided with constitutional protection and be constitutionally confirmed. The theory of quality of life, the thought of natural law and the three functions of constitutional right are the important theoretical basis for the constitutional protection of the right to health, and at the same time, the state life, the requirements of the times, the system of basic rights and the perfection of the department law. The need to fulfil international obligations is also an important reason for constitutional protection of the right to health. To make the right to health a constitutional right is only the first step. What is important is to make the state undertake the corresponding obligations, and whether to fulfill the obligations of the state is of great importance to the respect, realization and protection of the right to health. It is very important for the realization of the right to health to formulate a unified health and health law, to solve the limitation of the relevant judicature and to fulfill the duty of protection of the administrative and judicial organs.
【学位授予单位】:天津师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D921

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 林来梵,季彦敏;人权保障:作为原则的意义[J];法商研究;2005年04期

2 韩大元;;宪法文本中“人权条款”的规范分析[J];法学家;2004年04期

3 刘志刚;立法不作为的制度救济——论宪法诉讼的权利救济功能[J];法学评论;2003年02期

4 屠振宇;;未列举基本权利的认定方法[J];法学;2007年09期

5 周永坤;;宪法是静态的宪政宪政是动态的宪法[J];法学;2008年03期

6 龚向和;邓炜辉;;论农村老年人健康权的国家义务[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期

7 杜承铭;谢敏贤;;论健康权的宪法权利属性及实现[J];河北法学;2007年01期

8 焦洪昌;;论作为基本权利的健康权[J];中国政法大学学报;2010年01期

9 张一粟;陈奇伟;;论我国环境权入宪的基本架构[J];法学论坛;2008年04期

10 龚向和;刘耀辉;;基本权利的国家义务体系[J];云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年01期



本文编号:2118787

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2118787.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户41293***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com