当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 宪法论文 >

人大专题询问制度研究

发布时间:2018-07-15 20:34
【摘要】:询问是世界各国代议机关行使监督权所普遍采用的监督方式之一。根据宪法和法律的相关规定,我国人大及其常委会也拥有询问权。与人大的质询、特定问题调查、撤职和罢免等其他监督方式相比,询问具有灵活性、及时性、互动性和便捷性等特点。但在实践中,人大询问权一直难以落实。根据宪法的基本原理,结合宪法和人大相关法律法规的规定,本文在分析现有人大询问权行使现状尤其是近几年人大开展专题询问实践的基础上,对人大专题询问制度及其完善进行了探讨。 本论文共分为以下几个部分: 绪论部分提出论文选题的背景和意义,介绍本选题在国内外的研究现状。 第一章主要介绍人大专题询问制度的一般理论。在阐述人大专题询问的概念和特征基础上,文章对人大专题询问的权力属性进行了探讨,认为人大专题询问权是人大监督权的基本构成,也是人大履行其监督职能的重要方式。在比较人大专题询问权与质询权、特定问题调查权的区别后,文章对人大专题询问的价值尤其是对权力制约的宪法价值进行了深入分析。 第二章主要分析人大专题询问的现状及存在的问题。在梳理人大专题询问的法律规范依据的基础上,对各地展开专题询问的做法进行介绍,并详细的分析了广东省人大常委会以“农村垃圾管理工作情况”为主题的专题询问,在总结了实践经验的同时也对专题询问存在的不足进行了反思。 第三章主要提出完善人大专题询问制度的建议。一方面要从人大及其常委会的组织、人员素质、对专题询问的认识等方面完善人民代表大会制度。另一方面从宪法、基本法律、法规三个层面提出建立完善的人大专题询问制度的建议,,构建人大专题询问的法理基础。
[Abstract]:Inquiry is one of the common supervision methods used by representative organizations in the world. According to the relevant provisions of the Constitution and laws, the NPC and its standing Committee also have the right of inquiry. Compared with other supervision methods, such as the inquiry of the NPC, the investigation of specific issues, the removal of the post and the recall, the inquiry has the characteristics of flexibility, timeliness, interactivity and convenience. But in practice, the people's Congress inquiry power has been difficult to implement. According to the basic principles of the Constitution, combined with the Constitution and the relevant laws and regulations of the NPC, this paper analyzes the present situation of the exercise of the people's Congress's inquiry power, especially the practice of the people's Congress in carrying out special inquiries in recent years. This paper probes into the special inquiry system of the NPC and its perfection. This paper is divided into the following parts: the introduction part proposes the background and significance of the topic, and introduces the research status of this topic at home and abroad. The first chapter mainly introduces the general theory of the special inquiry system of the people's Congress. On the basis of expounding the concept and characteristics of the special inquiry of the people's Congress, this paper probes into the power attribute of the special question of the people's Congress, and holds that the power of the subject inquiry of the people's Congress is the basic constitution of the supervision power of the people's Congress and the important way for the people's Congress to perform its supervisory function. After comparing the difference between the people's Congress's special inquiry right and the inquiry right, the paper makes a deep analysis of the value of the people's Congress thematic inquiry, especially the constitutional value of the power restriction. The second chapter mainly analyzes the current situation and the existing problems of the special inquiry of the people's Congress. On the basis of combing the legal and normative basis of the special inquiry of the people's Congress, this paper introduces the practice of conducting the special inquiry in various places, and analyzes in detail the thematic inquiry of the standing Committee of the Guangdong Provincial people's Congress with the theme of "the situation of rural garbage management". At the same time, it also reflects on the shortcomings of thematic inquiry. The third chapter mainly puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the system of the special topic inquiry of the National people's Congress. On the one hand, it is necessary to perfect the system of the people's Congress from the organization of the NPC and its standing Committee, the quality of personnel, and the understanding of special inquiries. On the other hand, from the three aspects of constitution, basic law and regulation, the author puts forward the suggestion of establishing the perfect system of the special inquiry of the people's Congress, and constructs the legal basis of the special inquiry of the people's Congress.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D921

【共引文献】

相关会议论文 前10条

1 孙光骏;;论当前宪政制度下的独立行使检察权[A];首届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2005年

2 种松志;;论死刑复核的法律监督[A];第二届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2006年

3 李泽明;陈晓东;;检察官遴选制度探微[A];第四届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2008年

4 张云平;任海新;;完善自侦工作监督制约机制的思考[A];第四届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2008年

5 乐绍光;周彬彬;;相对不起诉权监督机制探析[A];第四届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2008年

6 张朝霞;贾晓文;;检察内部职权配置基础与路径研究[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

7 杨柳青;邓立;;在宽严相济刑事司法政策下完善刑事公诉权监督制约问题研究[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

8 王煜;赵刚;;行政检察权刍议[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

9 马剑萍;;试论我国民事执行的检察监督[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

10 张黎明;杨国章;;从法秩序利益看检察权的正当性[A];第五届国家高级检察官论坛论文集[C];2009年

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 丁建军;宋朝地方官员考核制度研究[D];河北大学;2009年

2 吴晓晖;论宏观调控决策的法律调整[D];华东政法大学;2010年

3 赵宁;罪状解释论[D];华东政法大学;2010年

4 陈玲;背信犯罪比较研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

5 许青松;间接正犯研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

6 张少林;被害人行为刑法意义之研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

7 李冠群;论国际私法系统视野下的最密切联系原则[D];大连海事大学;2010年

8 陈婧;政府公共信息资源协作管理研究[D];南开大学;2010年

9 叶伟为;上海九段沙湿地资源的保护研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2010年

10 张海斌;转型社会中的乡村自治与法治[D];华东政法大学;2010年



本文编号:2125302

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2125302.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户da3f1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com