论环境民事公益诉讼案件程序与实体法律的衔接

发布时间：2017-12-27 07:21

本文关键词：论环境民事公益诉讼案件程序与实体法律的衔接　出处：《黑龙江社会科学》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国现行环境公益诉讼规则的构建偏重程序方面,对相关实体规则的改良尚不充分,以至对环境民事公益诉讼案件的判决仍主要依赖于传统民事法律体系。无论对"环境社会公共利益"采取"公众共享环境社会公共利益"、抑或"不特定多数人享有环境利益"的解释,都难以使其获得民事法律救济。应当将"环境利益"划分为"受环境状态影响的利益"和"以环境状态为内容的利益"。在对环境民事公益诉讼实体规则进行完善的过程中,欧洲经验可资借鉴。应改良环境公益诉讼实体法律,实现程序与实体法律的衔接。
[Abstract]:The construction of current environmental public interest litigation rules in China focuses on procedural aspects, and the improvement of relevant substantive rules is not enough. Even the judgments on environmental civil public interest litigation still rely mainly on the traditional civil legal system. It is difficult for them to get civil legal remedies, regardless of the interpretation of "public shared environment, social public interest" or "no particular majority of people's interests in the environment". "Environmental interests" should be divided into "the interests affected by the environment" and "the interests of the environment as the content". In the process of perfecting the rules of environmental civil public interest litigation, European experience can be used for reference. The substantive law of environmental public interest litigation should be improved, and the connection between the procedure and the substantive law should be realized.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.68;D925.1
【正文快照】： 1具有代表性的案例如2014年的“泰州天价环境公益诉讼案”。参见别涛《环境公益诉讼的成功探索——泰州“天价环境公益诉讼案”始末及评析》,http://www.ce-news.com.cn/fzxw/fzyw/201501/t20150114_786427.html。2学界通说认为环境公益诉讼是通过司法措施保护环境的主要手段,

【参考文献】