我国侦查监听的程序规制
发布时间:2018-03-14 16:10
本文选题:技术侦查 切入点:监听 出处:《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:监听作为新型的侦破案件的手段,国外已经有相对完善的立法予以规范,我国有关监听的立法规定仍非常的粗略、原则,实施中也存在着权力滥用,相关立法亟待完善。监听的立法完善,首先需要确立规范监听的比例原则、令状原则,其次要确立监听具体的操作标准,申请先以三次为限,待有关监听的法律完善之后,可以根据实际情况再考虑是否取消相关的限定,将审批权赋予中立性的机关实施,以便实现权力制衡,最后要确立被监听人的权利及救济措施,赋予其知情权、使用权等,及时使被监听人了解监听情况,根据监听内容决定是否使用,,以便更好的实现控辩双方的平衡。随着刑事诉讼法的整体完善,上述立法的有效实施,相信我国未来的侦查监听程序能够得到有效的规制。
[Abstract]:As a new method of detecting cases, listening has been regulated by relatively perfect legislation in foreign countries. The legislative provisions on monitoring in our country are still very rough, and there are also abuses of power in the process of implementation. The relevant legislation needs to be consummated urgently. First of all, it is necessary to establish the principle of proportion of monitoring, the principle of writ, the principle of specific operation of monitoring, and to apply for the first three times, after the relevant laws on monitoring have been perfected, According to the actual situation, we can reconsider whether to cancel the relevant restrictions, and give the authority of examination and approval to the neutral organ to implement it in order to realize the balance of power. Finally, we should establish the rights and relief measures of the monitored person, give them the right to know, the right to use, and so on. Timely enable the monitored person to understand the monitoring situation and decide whether to use it according to the monitoring content, in order to better achieve the balance between the prosecution and the defense. With the overall perfection of the Criminal procedure Law, the above legislation is effectively implemented. It is believed that China's future surveillance procedures can be effectively regulated.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2;D922.14
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴宏耀;;刑事搜查扣押与私有财产权利保障——美国博伊德案的启示[J];东方法学;2010年03期
2 马新彦;石睿;;论知识经济时代空间隐私权的侵权法保护——以美国侵权法空间隐私权保护为启示的研究[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年02期
3 彭勃;论监听作为侦查手段的法律问题[J];法商研究;2002年06期
4 李明;监听问题立法研究[J];法学;2004年07期
5 谢佑平,万毅;在惩罚犯罪与保障人权之间:关于监听的法律思考[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
6 冉强;张红扬;;论构建监听制度的相对合理主义进路[J];前沿;2007年03期
7 张春霞;论隐私权在刑事诉讼领域的诉求[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年01期
8 李鹏,虞浔;监听的法治分析及本土架构[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2004年05期
9 张伟彦;;英美两国监听制度的比较与借鉴[J];韶关学院学报;2008年05期
10 张丽芳;通讯监听证据立法之探讨[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2003年02期
本文编号:1611949
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1611949.html