劳动合同期限分治的立法意义及其功能性回归

发布时间：2018-04-23 01:18

本文选题：劳动合同期限 + 分治　；参考：《法学评论》2017年05期

【摘要】：基于期限的不同,劳动合同界分为三种法定类型,特别是固定期限和无固定期限的分野,不仅具有类型化的意义,更为重要的是,分别承载着不同的立法效果与制度功能,具有解释论和立法论上的双重意义。劳动合同期限分治的立法安排在理念追求上无可厚非,但是立法技术之运用需要反思和调适。劳动合同期限立法的诸种实践困局昭示了其适度调适的必要性。对劳动者的倾斜性保护不能否定或忽视用人单位合理的利益诉求,劳动合同期限立法的调整应该也必须在充分考量劳资利益衡平的前提下寻求合理可行的路径,以矫正期限立法安排管制过度所导致的功能性变异,实现立法论意义上的功能性回归。
[Abstract]:Based on the difference of time limit, the labor contract is divided into three legal types, especially the fixed period and the unfixed period, which not only have the significance of typology, but also bear different legislative effects and system functions respectively. It has the double meaning in the theory of interpretation and the theory of legislation. The legislative arrangement of the division of labor contract term is not to be criticized in the pursuit of ideas, but the application of legislative technology needs reflection and adjustment. All kinds of practical difficulties in the legislation of labor contract term indicate the necessity of appropriate adjustment. The preferential protection to the laborer can not deny or ignore the reasonable interest demand of the employing unit. The adjustment of the labor contract term legislation should also seek a reasonable and feasible way under the premise of fully considering the interests of the labor and capital. In order to correct the functional variation caused by excessive regulation of legislative arrangement, the functional regression can be realized in the sense of legislative theory.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国退休制度整体改革与立法完善研究”(16AFX021)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.52

【相似文献】