群体性行政争议的法律救济途径研究

发布时间：2018-05-15 08:14

本文选题：群体性行政争议 + 非正常上访　；参考：《江西理工大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：“无救济即无权利”,我国现行法律规定了群体性行政争议的法律救济途径主要有申诉、信访、行政复议、行政诉讼等四种,但对其中某些问题的规定仍有遗漏和不明确之处,从而直接导致“信访不信法”、“非正常上访”等现象的发生,在对公民合法权益保护不力的同时,还浪费了大量的司法行政资源,极端不利于将群体性行政争议的解决纳入正常的法治轨道。如何有效运用法律救济途径化解群体性行政争议是我们亟需研究的重要课题。目前我国群体性行政争议的法律救济途径到底存在哪些问题?为什么现行法律救济途径没能有效发挥化解群体性行政争议的作用?我们要如何完善群体性行政争议的法律救济途径?本文在考察现实案例的基础上,总结群体性行政争议的概念和特征,深入剖析群体性行政争议的法律救济途径中存在的问题和不足,并试图从实证主义出发,找到群体性行政争议的最佳解决途径,有效引导群众运用合法、理性的方式表达诉求,努力将群体性行政争议化解在萌芽阶段。为此,本文分四章对群体性行政争议的法律救济途径进行研究,以期能对将来相关领域的立法、司法起到抛砖引玉的作用。第一章,对群体性行政争议及其救济途径进行概述。主要包括群体性行政争议的概念及特征,群体性行政争议与群体性非正常上访事件之间存在的内部关联,群体性行政争议的法律救济途径的概念、类型及其设置原则。第二章,群体性行政争议的法律救济途径之比较分析。对国外一些国家的典型特色救济途径进行介绍,形成了完善我国群体性行政争议的法律救济途径的一些启示。第三章,群体性行政争议的法律救济途径中存在的问题。从实证主义角度出发,深入分析我国现行群体性行政争议的各种法律救济途径中存在的各类问题。第四章,完善群体性行政争议的法律救济途径之构想。针对群体性行政争议的法律救济途径在实践中存在的问题,从信访、行政复议、行政诉讼及创新救济途径等方面提出了完善构想。
[Abstract]:"No remedy is no right". The current law of our country stipulates that there are four main ways of legal relief for group administrative disputes, such as appeal, petition, administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, but there are still some omissions and ambiguities in the provisions of some of them. As a direct result of the occurrence of the phenomena such as "letter and visit Law" and "abnormal petition", while not protecting citizens' legitimate rights and interests, they have also wasted a large number of judicial and administrative resources. Extremely unfavorable to the settlement of group administrative disputes into the normal track of the rule of law. How to effectively use legal remedies to resolve group administrative disputes is an important subject that we need to study urgently. What are the problems in the legal remedy of group administrative disputes in China? Why can't the current legal remedies play an effective role in resolving group administrative disputes? How do we improve the legal remedies for group administrative disputes? Based on the investigation of practical cases, this paper summarizes the concept and characteristics of group administrative disputes, analyzes deeply the problems and shortcomings in the legal remedies of group administrative disputes, and attempts to proceed from positivism. To find the best way to resolve the group administrative dispute, to effectively guide the masses to express their demands in a lawful and rational way, and to try to resolve the group administrative dispute in the embryonic stage. Therefore, this article divides four chapters to carry on the research to the legal relief way of the group administrative dispute, in order to be able to the future related domain legislation, the judicature to play the role of the inspiration. The first chapter summarizes the group administrative disputes and their remedies. It mainly includes the concept and characteristic of group administrative dispute, the internal relation between group administrative dispute and group abnormal petition event, the concept, type and setting principle of legal remedy way of group administrative dispute. The second chapter is the comparative analysis of the legal remedies of group administrative disputes. This paper introduces the typical ways of relief in some foreign countries and forms some enlightenments on how to perfect the ways of legal relief for group administrative disputes in our country. The third chapter, the problems existing in the legal remedies of group administrative disputes. From the perspective of positivism, this paper analyzes deeply the various problems existing in various ways of legal remedy of current group administrative disputes in China. Chapter four, the conception of perfecting the legal remedy of group administrative dispute. In view of the problems existing in the practice of the legal remedies of group administrative disputes, this paper puts forward a perfect conception from the aspects of letters and visits, administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation and innovative remedies.
【学位授予单位】：江西理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】