非医疗事故性损害责任研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 16:03

本文选题：非医疗事故性损害 + 构成要素　；参考：《江西财经大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国长期将医疗事故性损害作为解决医患矛盾的重点,并颁布了《医疗事故处理条例》予以专门规制。非医疗事故性损害作为医源性损害的有机组成部分,仅在《侵权责任法》中予以概括性规定。在医源性诊疗活动中,这些规定并不能充分满足人们的需要。非医疗事故性损害与医疗事故性损害在损害结果、归责原则、主观等方面存在较大差别,且医源性诊疗行为的违法性已经不是非医疗事故性损害的基本构成要素。笔者认为,为了更好地缓解医患矛盾,有必要对非医疗事故性损害责任的构成要素、归责原则、免责事由和损害鉴定进行分析、归纳和总结。《侵权责任法》对医源性损害做出了相关规定,非医疗事故性损害作为医源性损害的基本形式之一应当适用《侵权责任法》,但非医疗事故性损害又具有自身的特殊性。本文运用文献参考、比较分析和法律价值分析等方法,系统地对非医疗事故性损害的相关概念、属性、构成要素、免责事由、归责原则和损害鉴定进行归纳总结。在医患矛盾日益加剧的今天,作者期望通过对非医疗事故性损害责任进行研究,为日后处理非医疗事故性损害纠纷案件提供有力的理论支持和参考意见,更加明确医方与患方的权利、义务,以化解医患双方的矛盾。
[Abstract]:For a long time, medical malpractice damage is regarded as the key point to solve the contradiction between doctors and patients, and the regulations on treatment of Medical malpractice are specially regulated. As an organic part of iatrogenic damage, non-medical malpractice damage is only generally stipulated in Tort liability Law. In iatrogenic diagnosis and treatment activities, these regulations can not fully meet the needs of people. There are great differences between non-medical malpractice damage and medical malpractice damage in damage result, imputation principle, subjective and so on, and the illegality of iatrogenic diagnosis and treatment behavior is no longer the basic constituent element of non-medical malpractice damage. The author thinks that in order to alleviate the contradiction between doctors and patients, it is necessary to analyze the elements of non-medical accident damage liability, the principle of liability, the cause of exemption and the identification of damage. Summary. The Tort liability Act provides for iatrogenic damage. As one of the basic forms of iatrogenic damage, non-medical malpractice damage should be applied to tort liability law, but non-medical malpractice damage has its own particularity. By using the methods of literature reference, comparative analysis and legal value analysis, this paper systematically summarizes the related concepts, attributes, constituent elements, exemption reasons, imputation principles and damage appraisal of non-medical malpractice damage. With the increasing contradiction between doctors and patients, the author hopes to provide theoretical support and reference for the future handling of non-medical malpractice injury disputes through the study of non-medical malpractice damage liability. More clearly the rights and obligations of doctors and patients to resolve the contradictions between doctors and patients.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.16;D923

【参考文献】