论正当反恐法律机制的创建

发布时间：2018-05-26 18:14

本文选题：国家安全 + 人权保护　；参考：《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年05期

【摘要】：在确立反恐立场、制定反恐法律、采取反恐行动的过程中,保障国家安全与保障公民权利自由之间的平衡关系,是衡量反恐正当性的标尺。在二者的关系中,将任何一方推向极端的做法都是不可取的,因为国家安全与公民权利自由虽然在行动取向上有所不同,但在最终价值取向上却是一致的。国际反恐不能突破国际人权与人道主义法的底线,国家反恐也不能不受人权义务和法律义务的规制。中国的反恐法治化建设,应在反思英美等国反恐问题上的教训基础上,在借鉴其较为完备的反恐立法、反恐机制、反恐措施与经验基础上,破除国家安全和公民权利自由二元对立的思维束缚,平衡好国家安全保障与公民权利自由保障之间的关系,结合中国国情为反恐确立坚实的正当性基础,并在依法治国背景下将之熔铸进体系化的反恐法律体系与机制之中。
[Abstract]:In the process of establishing counter-terrorism position, making counter-terrorism laws and taking counter-terrorism actions, the balance between national security and the protection of civil rights is the yardstick to measure the legitimacy of counter-terrorism. In the relationship between the two, it is not possible to push any party to extremes, because national security and civil rights freedom are in spite of The orientation of action is different, but it is consistent in the ultimate value orientation. International counter-terrorism can not break through the bottom line of international human rights and humanitarian law, and the national counter-terrorism should not be regulated by human rights and legal obligations. On the basis of its relatively complete counter-terrorism legislation, counter-terrorism mechanism, counter-terrorism measures and experience, it can break the thinking shackles of the two yuan opposition of national security and civil rights freedom, balance the relationship between national security and civil rights, and establish a solid basis for counter-terrorism combined with the national conditions of China, and in the context of the rule of law. It will be cast into a systematic anti-terrorism legal system and mechanism.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金“外来理念与中国文化的融合”(11040074614040)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.14

【参考文献】