教育平等权的保护—高校录取制度的分析
发布时间:2018-06-19 19:11
本文选题:教育平等权 + 高考录取 ; 参考:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文主要是从当前我国大陆地区的高考录取为出发来浅析教育平等权的保护。公平正义是社会主义法治理念中的价值追求,在倡导法治社会法治中国的今天,国家在法律制度建设法治改革的进程中不断取得骄人的成绩,随着社会的发展,思想的进步,国际交流的繁荣,我国公民已经不再仅仅满足于物质追求,越来越重视人权的保护,追求人格上的平等和尊严,而教育平等权更是事关一个人的人格平等和尊严。此外,教育平等权能否得到切实的保障对于我国高等教育普及化、提高全民教育素质水平都很关键。中国目前已经进入老龄化社会,未来人口红利即将消失,而劳动力素质水平普遍偏低,受过高等教育的劳动力比重远低于国外发达国家,对于应对人口老龄化带来的一系列压力,落实教育平等权保护好每一位公民的教育平等权至关重要。在文章中采用的研究方法主要有资料分析、实证研究、案例分析等。在整个过程中,以高考录取为切入分析点,主要从高考录取的现在的情况分布、以及录取制度中的平等、合理差别、不合理的歧视入手分析,提出了“补偿正义程序化“的解决措施。本文在论述的理论上和方法上肯定存在很多的不足,分析浅显,仍需要继续不断地深入和完善。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the protection of the right of equality of education from the entrance examination in mainland China. Fairness and justice is the pursuit of value in the concept of socialist rule of law. Today, when China advocates the rule of law in a society governed by law, the country has made remarkable achievements in the process of legal system construction and legal reform. With the development of the society, the progress of ideas has been achieved. With the prosperity of international communication, Chinese citizens are no longer satisfied with the material pursuit and pay more and more attention to the protection of human rights and the pursuit of equality and dignity of personality, and the right to equality in education is related to the equality and dignity of a person's personality. In addition, whether or not the right to equality of education can be guaranteed is crucial to the popularization of higher education and the improvement of the quality of education for all. At present, China has entered an aging society, and the future demographic dividend will soon disappear, while the level of labor quality is generally low, and the proportion of the labor force with higher education is far lower than that of the developed countries abroad. In order to deal with a series of pressure brought by the aging population, it is very important to implement the right to education equality and protect every citizen's right to education equality. The research methods used in this paper include data analysis, empirical research, case analysis and so on. In the whole process, taking college entrance examination admission as the analysis point, mainly from the current situation distribution of college entrance examination admission, as well as the equality, reasonable difference and unreasonable discrimination in the admission system. This paper puts forward some measures to solve the problem of the procedure of compensation justice. There must be many deficiencies in the theory and method discussed in this paper.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 孙一平;董晓倩;;概念与困境:平等问题的当代解读[J];学习与探索;2011年06期
2 张千帆;;中国大学招生指标制度的合宪性分析[J];中外法学;2011年02期
3 张杰;汪进元;;农民工子女受教育权的平等保护[J];华东政法大学学报;2009年02期
4 张千帆;;歧视还是纠偏?——高考录取分数线差别的合宪性检验[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年02期
5 葛明荣;葛明珍;;论我国高等教育平等权的保护[J];黑龙江高教研究;2005年11期
6 李卫平;“高考移民”现象的法学思考[J];湖北招生考试;2004年20期
7 焦洪昌;关于“公民在法律面前一律平等”的再认识[J];中国法学;2002年06期
8 朱应平;教育平等权的司法保护[J];政治与法律;2002年01期
9 傅志田;;关于我国高等教育国际化的思考[J];上海教育;2001年09期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 张千帆;;实现教育机会平等需打破高考地方保护主义[N];法制日报;2009年
,本文编号:2040965
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2040965.html